The regular administrative staff are taking a vacation, and in the meantime, Biigoh is taking over. See here for more information.
A notice about Rule 3 regarding sites hosting pirated/unauthorized content has been made. Please see here for details.
Staff is working to deal with the problem of synonymous tags. See here for more information and to suggest tag mergers.
Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com.
Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
Wouldn't that be beautiful?
There is divide between people who are for a pill that would make you physically fit and the ones who abhor idea and claim that without training this isn't "true".
It's in part due to signaling, in part self-value derived from belonging to certain group, and surely...
I don't see a problem with this, although it would be toothless warning in absence of the way to verify the AI use.
With necro (and I think that's a stupid rule) it is immediately obvious when the rule was broken.
Also, I don't see a problem and it would be an empty gesture.
I don't think...
Yes, but that's bit different, you are talking more about utility.
In art, for example, there are people who care that the art is old. If they would discover it is "perfect modern forgery" they would feel tricked and wouldn't enjoy it as much anymore - despite nothing really changing.
People...
I'm against indulging neuroticism of small portion of users, no matter what they claim is the reason of their neuroticism.
Unfortunately, we don't live in the perfect world. We also shouldn't be forced to die, alas both AI detection without fail-positives and immortality is impossible for now...
It's unreasonable to demand "witch hunts" or to create some commission that will decide whether the fic used or didn't use AI.
Maybe people who jump at shadows are the problem, and we shouldn't excuse them or indulge them? Hmmm. Yes.
Some people just refuse to acknowledge that you cannot...
I detect it through reading, it is kinda obvious after a while, the telltales are there.
Honestly, I don't care that much, most of AI-using fiction goes into the category of slop: forgetful, unengaging, inoffensive. The overall verbose style of writing that AI pushes doesn't help, even if it...
It's currently unfeasible.
If it's so valueless, why the need for the label? It should be obvious.
It's a common saying that 90%, or 95%, or 99% of everything is shit. And yet, there's no need to label things as "bad art". There's no fear that the sheer volume of bad art will make it...
I never even thought about it; interesting.
Also, it may reveal how different people look at art. For example, I have always pretty much completely separated the artist from the art, and consider that interaction between the art and the recipient to be important, where meaning and beauty arise...
We don't need another excuse for a holier-than-thou mob of the internet's petty, narcissistic sadists so they could indulge in attacking and shaming people over inconsequential bullshit while keeping their masks of "good people". We have enough of this as is.
***
There is an inherent...
Thank you.
I hope I wasn't being a hypocrite and didn't get hostile or insult you when we were disagreeing. Even if I do not always manage to, I try to talk to others as I wish to be spoken to. There's no need to get nasty because I think someone's wrong or I didn't convince them. In the end...
If you are unable to distinguish AI-prose and no-AI-prose, is the difference worth looking for?
I've read story like this before AI. It was probably even more batshit insane that AI is capable.
Thanks, it's nice to learn something curious from time to time.
I knew about the non-sexual meaning of rape, but always thought that's commonly accepted as a secondary, a niche meaning. A metaphor, a simile to get emotional weight across - but now I know that some treat it literally.
I'm bit...
I think there's a difference, but I get your viewpoint.
Could you explain to me why removing sexual element from the rape is the default option and not just an excuse to call something a rape?
Haha, you got it.
From a certain point of view, it is ;)
Every talk changes the brain, and so unwanted speech is a "forcibly changing the brain".
Ergo: the charismatic people are mind-controlling rapists.
(Would such a defence hold in the court? "My honour, he talked to me! It was obviously a...