1. Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. If you wish to change your username, please ask via conversation to tehelgee instead of asking via my profile. I'd like to not clutter it up with such requests.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
    Dismiss Notice
  6. A note about the current Ukraine situation: Discussion of it is still prohibited as per Rule 8
    Dismiss Notice
  7. The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.
    Dismiss Notice
  8. The testbed for the QQ XF2 transition is now publicly available. Please see more information here.
    Dismiss Notice

What’s the policy for advocating violence?

Discussion in 'Announcements and Rules' started by Daytripper, Aug 5, 2021.

  1. Daytripper

    Daytripper Connoisseur.

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2017
    Messages:
    14,795
    Likes Received:
    186,312
    What rule does advocating violence fall under?
     
  2. alethiophile

    alethiophile Shadowed Philosopher Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    7,612
    Likes Received:
    53,734
    Usually rule 1.

    If you see a post that you think breaks the rules, you should just report it. You don't need to look up which rule you think it breaks -- giving your reasoning in plain English is fine.
     
  3. daniel_gudman

    daniel_gudman KING (in land of blind)

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2014
    Messages:
    2,032
    Likes Received:
    25,274
    To be super pedantic I would think advocating violence against a particular person violates Rule 1, whereas advocating violence against a group is probably a Rule 8 violation instead / as well. Since advocating violence against a group probably counts as political advocacy.
     
    Daytripper likes this.
  4. alethiophile

    alethiophile Shadowed Philosopher Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2013
    Messages:
    7,612
    Likes Received:
    53,734
    It would be a case-by-case determination. But, again, that's not all that important on the user's end.
     
  5. Stanley_Jeb

    Stanley_Jeb Versed in the lewd.

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2019
    Messages:
    1,791
    Likes Received:
    10,466
    Wait, how doesn't that go against Rule 3?
    Isn't advocating for violence straight up illegal (speech that incites lawless action)?
     
  6. daniel_gudman

    daniel_gudman KING (in land of blind)

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2014
    Messages:
    2,032
    Likes Received:
    25,274
    I dunno about other polities but in the United States at least it's "incitement to imminent lawless action", you have to be encouraging someone specific to commit a specific violent crime right then and there, and it has to be "likely".

    So it's basically impossible that anyone could possibly commit incitement (in a "legal culpability" sense) posting on a forum board.

    But like yeah, the legal standard that constrains the deployment of State Power against "speech" is a different category than what's going on here, which is more like, a private association setting terms of membership, or something like that.
     
  7. Tabby_Overlord

    Tabby_Overlord Gone for Good

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2019
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    64
    Stop advocating and do it.
     
  8. Tranquil Zebra

    Tranquil Zebra Equid of Peerless Tranquility

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2015
    Messages:
    381
    Likes Received:
    3,406
    So, I believe that there could be several ways of breaking forum rules by advocating violence. The obvious example of "punch a nazi" would probably fall under rule 8, I believe, while "you are a nazi, someone should punch you" would probably fall under rule 1 for being hateful. "X is a nazi, here's the dox, someone punch X quickly!" would probably fall under rule 3 as flat out illegal, if there exists the probability of imminent harm to X.

    Saying something like "Congress should pass a law proscribing nazism, and the punishment shall be punching" is probably so removed from current politics and so absurd as to be construed as a joke, and might in fact be an allowed way to advocate violence against a group. I would still advise against advocating violence towards anyone, as even though there might be principled arguments for visiting violence upon someone, QQ is very much not the right place to make those arguments.