• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • The issue with logging in with email addresses has been resolved.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Questionable Questing

Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
That's not the appeal of twins. It's the subtle differences.
tehelgee
tehelgee
Incest is no small part of it.

Twin fantasies have been low-key acceptable incest stuff since before incest became 'mainstream' as far as it goes.
silentshot
silentshot
Well all twins look the same to me.
Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
Subtle: So delicate or precise as to be difficult to analyse or describe. / Delicately complex and understated.
magic9mushroom
magic9mushroom
Valette-Serafina: I hope you mean it's not the appeal of twins *to you*.
Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
If you like redundancy, mushroom, your kink is clones, not twins.
magic9mushroom
magic9mushroom
I wasn't so much going after "redundancy" as "subtle differences".
Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
If the differences aren't subtle, it's a sister fetish more than a twin kink.
magic9mushroom
magic9mushroom
And again you miss my point.

Twin kink can be about identicality, which is not the same thing as redundancy.
Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
If it's about the similarities entirely, with no interest in the differences be they physical or otherwise, then it's clones, not twins.
magic9mushroom
magic9mushroom
What is your definition of "clone", here? Clones in the RL biology sense are a superset of monozygotic twins and the non-twin ones are by necessity non-identical (e.g. Haruka/Kurumi, Yuubiseiharukana/Yuubiseiakikana).
Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
The conventional meaning, rather than the scientific.
magic9mushroom
magic9mushroom
I am not a party to such a convention. Please specify.
Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
The meaning popularized by science fiction, in which a clone is an exact copy of the cloned, down to memories. This same meaning being the one used in translating Kage Bushin as Shadow Clone in Naruto, a fairly well-known anime and manga.
magic9mushroom
magic9mushroom
In that sense, yes, it is. However, twins are about as close as you can get to that ideal barring some form of magic or science-fictional technology (there are theorems in quantum physics that forbid exact copying even in theory, although greater resemblance than identical twins is of course physically possible).
Valette-Serafina
Valette-Serafina
We're talking about fiction, on Questionable Questing. Reality has no bearing on this, unless you want to interpret the first post in this chain as intolerably monstrous.

Did you perhaps miss the context, mushroom?
magic9mushroom
magic9mushroom
Fiction isn't necessarily the kind of science fiction or fantasy that has that capability.
Back
Top