We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com.
Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.
And while I agree, I also say that once Batman has Arrested Joker, ANYONE has the skills and equipment to finish the fight too. We're dispassionately discussing murder as armchair generals, we aren't talking about a killing of passion here.
But if the narrative says the law and citizens are...
[This Chapter is Sponsored by "novel66835", an Ōtsutsuki Level Supporter. if you're interested in sponsoring a chapter, consider joining the Patreon.]
Upto 50 Advance Chapters (4 Months Worth) available
💪You can now read upto Chapter 33 — for free.💪
Goal 1 ✅
[Goal 2: Reach 12(+8🔼)/25 Paid...
Threadmarks: [Warning]: for chapter 23: Gouged out
What I'm about to do to Hinata may stay with you.
This isn't gentle. It isn't fair. And it's definitely not for the soft-hearted.
If your day's already been rough,
if your heart's carrying a little too much today - come back later.
Protect your peace first.
But if you're ready to see innocence...
It's right there in her name: Catwoman
(Side note about cats and their chasing behavour: When I used a laser pointer to play with my cat, I always ended it by directing the dot to a piece of food that I had placed while she was otherwise occupied chasing that enticing dot. Ending it by not...
Bluntly? None of the staff have strong feelings on if they care at all. If anyone did, we don’t have the tools to reliably enforce such a rule - and they flat-out don’t exist, most ‘AI’ detectors are less reliable than letting a pitbull babysit your cage of hamsters. Sure, it may scold one that...
I certainly hope something screws up and she's detected because I loathe Cauldron, also her eye replacement better not have any metal in it or it's coming outta the socket. Thanks Ack!
Yeah, with text, enforcement is hell to deal with, so no. I've already seen some gits complaining about AI in a story whose narration has been the same long before AI became mainstream. It's just fucking annoying for readers, and infuriating for authors.
And with art? It's kinda obvious when...
If its feels not too much to ask, its only because you are not the one who have to enforce it. Do you think reading through dozens of stories to determine wthether they use AI or not easy task? Especially since those stories would be badly written to cause them got reported/accused of using AI...
I don't like this.
I think AI labelling should be obligatory for both text and image and if its not labled it should be a violation. Best would be a trinary labelling "" (nothing, ie no AI) / "Some AI" / "AI" with the cutoffs being 0% and 50%, so for images using AI to touch up a non-AI original...
Have you tried 1. using an advanced model that can both adhere to instructions and be intelligent about it? 2. defining a specific writing style by providing a large example? 3. holding it's hand and asking for very specific descriptions of events? 4. always concentrating on narrow scope? 5...
AFAIK, you can't use CSS to unzalgo text because zalgo is an abuse of Unicode combining characters rather than an external style applied to the text. You could theoretically write a Javascript bookmarklet that strips the combining characters out of all text on the page, but I don't know how...