• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Rule 3 clarification: do any of these count as photorealistic?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Surely AI models were trained on a lot of images of astronauts riding horses on the moon. And a lot of images of real anthropomorphic cats/dogs/dragons/whathaveyou yiffing in hell.
You're talking about combining different ingredients together to make something. I'm talking about one of the ingredients themselves. Can you get AI to generate a realistic horse, if you aren't allowed to train your AI with any images of horses?
 
You're talking about combining different ingredients together to make something. I'm talking about one of the ingredients themselves. Can you get AI to generate a realistic horse, if you aren't allowed to train your AI with any images of horses?

I would assume it's a mixture of "child = small person" and the fact that it has SFW images of children to use, plus lolicon stuff (based on what I've seen from the SFW images posted here, the "realistic" stuff seems to look more like an anime character living in the real world than like an actual child).
 
I would assume it's a mixture of "child = small person" and the fact that it has SFW images of children to use, plus lolicon stuff (based on what I've seen from the SFW images posted here, the "realistic" stuff seems to look more like an anime character living in the real world than like an actual child).
Probably because the model was trained with anime images and somebody dded a lora or a prompt to make it more realistic.
Adding glossy or photorealistic for instance does that.
 
Last edited:
Second if stuff like that becomes commonplace it would make it ten times as difficult for law enforcement to correctly identify the real thing, and arrest the people who produce/consume it.
If it becomes commonplace, no-one will bother making the real thing anymore, for much the same reason that films use special effects rather than putting their actors in real mortal danger. It is expensive, particularly in risk premium, to film the rape of actual children compared to making virtual CP with generative AI, and hence the former will be driven from the market.
 
Last edited:
If it becomes commonplace, no-one will bother making the real thing anymore, for much the same reason that films use special effects rather than putting their actors in real mortal danger. It is expensive, particularly in risk premium, to film the rape of actual children compared to making virtual CP with generative AI, and hence the former will be driven from the market.
Why do I feel like that is a strange application of Gresham's Law?
 
Why do I feel like that is a strange application of Gresham's Law?
Well, it's an economic argument involving the idea of things being driven from the market, but it's different in significant ways (Gresham's Law relies on legal tender laws, and operates in reverse without them; also, good money driven out by Gresham's Law is hoarded, whereas here we're talking about RLCP simply not being made at all).
 
If it becomes commonplace, no-one will bother making the real thing anymore, for much the same reason that films use special effects rather than putting their actors in real mortal danger. It is expensive, particularly in risk premium, to film the rape of actual children compared to making virtual CP with generative AI, and hence the former will be driven from the market.
You are forgetting that there are such things as power tripping assholes with lots of money who might want to watch this sort of stuff exactly because real people are involved.

However, if there is a certain percentage of the population that is into this stuff and can scratch its itch without real kids being harmed, thus reducing the actual damage done by rteal CP, then I don't see why AI generated stuff should not be permitted since my view of law basically corresponds with the core tenant of roman law, which is "not to injure others".

Also, how is this entire discussion related to the thread subject again?
 
I feel this discussion is getting into Rule 8 weeds. Long story short, allowing photorealistic "AI generated CP" on this site, or any site, would create massive amount of work for a lot of people that already have too high a workload. Not worth it.
 
If someone else, like the OP or BlackDragon98 did, wants to ask whether a certain image is okay, they can contact us, but this thread has run its course, and there's been seven mod/admin posts on the first page about this subject already (not counting my first).

General AI discussion should take place in one of the general AI threads (1, 2, 3), we don't need another one. Locking.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top