• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

[SFW] A Pact of Monsters II [Garden of Monsters Civ/Rp/Council game] [Ended]

Re: [NSFW] A Pact of Monsters II [Garden of Monsters Civ/Rp/Council game]

Im going to have to do these rolls over again...

Ugg....


Know what Im going to repost them and let you guys do the actual rolls. The board can't handle my rolling system and kinda fucked it up.
 
Re: [NSFW] A Pact of Monsters II [Garden of Monsters Civ/Rp/Council game]

ROLLS FOR MONTH 1





GROUP ROLL
[blockquote]Rolled 1d100-40 : 29 - 40, total -11[/blockquote]




Player: Wing101
Name: Verethragna
Bonuses = 2 technical, 1 modifyer. -1d20 challenge
Action Scouting: 1d100+2+1-1d20



Player: Gibbousmoons
Name: Avid Learner
Bonuses: 9 technical, 6 ideal, 3 planning. -1d20 challenge
Action Scouting: 1d100+9+6+3-1d20




Player: KingLugia
Name: Eden's Garden
Bonuses: (Attunement successful on 10 or higher) 4 technical. -10 challenge.
Action Attunement interruption: 1d20+4-10



Player: MrGazzer
Name: Zerelth
Bonuses: 5 Combat, 5 ideal, 5+5 modifier, 3 bonus skill, -5 grouping bonus, -1d25 area challenge

Player: Cyanios
Name: Old Crow
Bonuses: 6 combat, 7 ideal, 6+6 modifier, 3+6 bonus skill, -5 grouping bonus, -1d25 area challenge

Action Hunting: 1d100+6+7+6+6+3+6+5+5+5+5+3-5-5-1d25





Player: CrawlingChaos74
Name: Eternal Storm
Bonuses: 8 combat, 5 ideal, 8+8 modifier, 14 bonus skill, -1d25 area challenge
Action Hunting: 1d100+8+5+8+8+14-1d25





Player: Adyen
Name: Kohas
Bonuses: 3 technical, 12 ideal, 1 planning. -1d20 challenge
Action Scouting: 1d100+3+15+9-1d20




Player: Bloodshifter
Name: Sov Rein
Bonuses: 5 combat, 7 ideal, 1+5 modifier, -1d25 area challenge (Challenge rolled separately. If challenge total lower than skills total then automatic win)
Action Hunting: 1d100+8+5+8+8+14
Challenge roll: 1d25




Player: ReinZero
Name: Ephemeral of Existence
Bonuses: 4 Technical, 7 ideal, 4 modifier, -1d20 challenge
Action Storehouse setup: 1d100+4+7+4-1d20





Player: Mishie
Name: Kro'Lit
Bonuses: 10 combat, 5 ideal, 10+10 modifier, 10 planning, 1d5+10 bonus skill, -50 Directed Challenge
Action Hunting: 1d100+10+5+10+10+10+1d5+10-50
 
gibbousmoons said:
You're great, but I'm stuck just barely inside the neutral zone. Don't suppose there's a way to modify that, is there?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

No, that's actually a terrible roll for me cause I have Aura of Failure up on myself.

That's actually an Actively Horrible Roll for me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Adyen said:
No, that's actually a terrible roll for me cause I have Aura of Failure up on myself.

That's actually an Actively Horrible Roll for me.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Get a skill later to swap rolls with someone else?
 
Here's my roll too bad I've got a minus or I would have gotten stupidly succesful.

1d100+2+1-1d20=97+2+1-11=89

link:
http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/4612649/
 
embed
 
*Wonders if Rein will get another wonderful failure like last iteration*
 
http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/4612784/

Holy FUCK...

1d100+8+5+8+8+14;1d25 → [99,8,5,8,8,14] = (142)
1d100+8+5+8+8+14;1d25 → [14] = (14)

Winning! SO WIN.
 
Bloodshifter said:
http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/4612784/

Holy FUCK...

1d100+8+5+8+8+14;1d25 → [99,8,5,8,8,14] = (142)
1d100+8+5+8+8+14;1d25 → [14] = (14)

Winning! SO WIN.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Mishie, should I break the ([REDACTED]) news to him? Or do you want to do that for me?
 
http://invisiblecastle.com/roller/view/4612795/


1d100+6+7+6+6+3+6+5+5+5+5+3-5-5-1d25 → [94,6,7,6,6,3,6,5,5,5,5,3,-5,-5,-20] = (121)
 
Honestly, I love how our group roll is even lower than what it originally was. And I think I realize why it's -40 too.

Should I be asking for a reroll there? A -30 is slightly better than -40, right?
 
Group roll? I guess we failed hard eh?

On the more fun side, 121 is neat a roll for huntage.
 
Adyen said:
Honestly, I love how our group roll is even lower than what it originally was. And I think I realize why it's -40 too.

Should I be asking for a reroll there? A -30 is slightly better than -40, right?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

A -11 is still a Double. I checked with Xicree.

That aside, Blood, we already did your roll on the irc chat. That and Xicree messed up your roll's stuff, thus invalidating rolls using that formula.

That aside, Cyanios, your roll was folded with MrGazzer's. Thus your roll is extraneous.
 
ReinZero said:
A -11 is still a Double. I checked with Xicree.

That aside, Blood, we already did your roll on the irc chat. That and Xicree messed up your roll's stuff, thus invalidating rolls using that formula.

That aside, Cyanios, your roll was folded with MrGazzer's. Thus your roll is extraneous.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
*snicker*

Oh, sorry was too sleepy to notice.
 
ReinZero said:
A -11 is still a Double. I checked with Xicree.

That aside, Blood, we already did your roll on the irc chat. That and Xicree messed up your roll's stuff, thus invalidating rolls using that formula.

That aside, Cyanios, your roll was folded with MrGazzer's. Thus your roll is extraneous.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

*snicker x2*

Really? -11 still counts as a double and succeeds? That's hilarious.
 
Adyen said:
Really? -11 still counts as a double and succeeds? That's hilarious.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I asked, mostly because:

1) Seriously, a negative result?
2) There are no dice char listed results for negative rolls... but there are for doubles.
3) Doubles bit never stated it had to be a positive double.

I'm not sure why you guys are being asses/dicks about it though. Oh wait, that explains the dice.
 
Uh, ya. I was just laughing at how funny it is for us to succeed with a negative roll.
 
Cyanios said:
We are being what now?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Adyen said:
Uh, ya. I was just laughing at how funny it is for us to succeed with a negative roll.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...



Responding while block quoting (without breaking the block up) makes it hard to tell just what you're snickering at. Thus in turn easily painting you guys as being asses/jerks because someone pointed out what you guys completely overlooked.
 
ReinZero said:
Responding while block quoting (without breaking the block up) makes it hard to tell just what you're snickering at. Thus in turn easily painting you guys as being asses/jerks because someone pointed out what you guys completely overlooked.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
So is calling people assholes. I only responded to the two that was reasonable for me to respond to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top