Avernus
Know what you're doing yet?
- Joined
- May 22, 2020
- Messages
- 170
- Likes received
- 1,594
"If you give Frodo a lightsaber you should then give Sauron a Death Star" is an old, bad piece of writing advice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"If you give Frodo a lightsaber you should then give Sauron a Death Star" is an old, bad piece of writing advice.
I see just asking what's the celestial forge"If you give Frodo a lightsaber you should then give Sauron a Death Star" is an old, bad piece of writing advice.
It's not like Frodo getting a lightsaber would change anything, given who Sauron is. Like, seriously, Sauron, lore-wise, would be more powerful than any Death Star."If you give Frodo a lightsaber you should then give Sauron a Death Star" is an old, bad piece of writing advice.
22.2 axisIf you make a story about the scaling of numbers, you should make sure they all add up to 666. This number is the sum total of all things that can be counted using numbers. If you make all stats add up to 666, then you will have perfect betting odds for who will win between the hero and the villain.
Then, once the odds are set, and the bets are in, the teams can actually play the game and frustrate every gambler who thought they had a perfect system.
Because it turns out there's a huge part of life that can't be counted or quantified or compared using metrics. Much like how the circumference of a circle is not 6 radians, but 2π = 6.283(something irrational)... It's the irrational part of the number that will kick your ass every time if you try to ignore it or round it off.
More or less how James Bond is written. To some extent, a lot of the great men of history (Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan) were like this. One can't blame amateur writers for wanting to be like these men. The power fantasy is always, "If I could do whatever I wanted and get away with it, and I can never lose a fight". The difference is always how convincing the writer can make it, whether he did any research or knows anything about how power works, or if he's just a kid in a sandbox arguing about how his powers beat your powers times infinity.
Would be fine if he wasn't Lawful Good but was instead Lawful Evil. People these days have a hard time separating good from evil, and often they default to: "It's good when I do it, and it's evil when someone I don't like does it". Or they just go by whether the guy wears white or wears black. That's because being a Lawful Good Chad is actually very difficult, and there are not many examples out there to follow. It takes a lot of self-discipline and empathy for how other people think. It's much easier to just be a selfish hedonist.
Goes back to the god emperors of the bronze age, who destroyed cities and slaughtered men, women, and children in great numbers, and had thousands of slaves singing their praises because they knew what would happen to them if they didn't. Power fantasies tap into ancient motivations long repressed by moral frameworks that were designed to prevent the destruction of cities and the great slaughter of men, women, and children.What's more, the entire harem and the secondary male drones are at his feet, accepting his every action and singing his praises.
Sometimes all a guy needs is the right opportunities, and to get out from under modern society's thumb ^_^
Yep. If a writer doesn't know how to write an MC who is not a shitbag, it's also likely that he doesn't know how to write women either, or really anyone who isn't himself.it could be reduced to not knowing how to write a female character
The Bechdel test was invented for this exact reason.All the girls share a single brain cell and think only about the protagonist
The millennial canon. Much as the Greeks had Homer's epics to frame their world view, and medieval Europeans had the Bible and Aristotle, modern millennials have these cartoon shows.the best The Simpsons seasons, all Family Guy seasons and the first four seasons of Futurama
More to the point for a thread like this, it's harder to write a "lawful good" character, at least well. It means you have to write with concern for the other characters, come up with reasonable solutions to problems and not just smash everything in your way. And since it is harder most writers end up either writing an amoral or evil character and calling them "good", or twist the plot so the protagonist is always right without ever having to actually worry about anyone else.That's because being a Lawful Good Chad is actually very difficult, and there are not many examples out there to follow. It takes a lot of self-discipline and empathy for how other people think. It's much easier to just be a selfish hedonist.
But James Bond doesn't pretend to be a moral paragon. He's a British intelligence agent. Women jump into his bed because he's courting them. Women don't just see his body and decide they want his penis. No, they interact, he jokes, finds a way to connect with these women, and ultimately wins.
What's more, the entire harem and the secondary male drones are at his feet, accepting his every action and singing his praises.
I don't think it's that hard to write LG characters in general, but they are usually not seen as Chads because they put justice above personal power, so they lack the sort of ruthlessness that propels people into power and builds harems from the ground up. The more common sort of LG Chad is just a family man, maybe holds a position of influence and respect in a community, and is willing to lead men into battle if absolutely forced to... but would much prefer to live in peace. I'm thinking perhaps of someone like Faramir, who is quite virtuous, but not a Chad like his big brother Boromir, who is more corruptible. Though Aragorn seems to be both good and a Chad. No harem for any of them though.More to the point for a thread like this, it's harder to write a "lawful good" character, at least well.
I was referring only to the sociopath part, not the rest of it. Bond is a Chad and a sociopath, that's all.To claim that James Bond is written this way is the most outright lie I have ever heard.
Yeah. The issue isn't really writing a male character with a "harem" or a Casanova type like Bond. The issue is writing those men in a way where people just don't buy that women would be interested in him in the first place. That requires good character writing, rather than just turning the female characters into effectively sex dolls.But James Bond doesn't pretend to be a moral paragon. He's a British intelligence agent. Women jump into his bed because he's courting them. Women don't just see his body and decide they want his penis. No, they interact, he jokes, finds a way to connect with these women, and ultimately wins.
Late response, but I'm honestly less bothered by the opposite trope (Ron the Death Eater) than by this trope. The reason being is that there are plenty of examples of characters in fiction going from villain to anti-hero (or even straight up hero in some cases). Examples that come to mind are Godzilla, Kong, Vegeta, Venom, the Gotham Sirens (Catwoman, Poison Ivy and Harley Quinn), Black Cat, Emma Frost, Boba Fett, Shadow, etc). Even in the world of public domain we've had classic monsters like Dracula and Frankenstein being made into lovable goofballs in stuff like Hotel Transylvania or sympathetic portrayals of the Lucifer in stuff like Good Omens, Sandman and Hazbin Hotel.I dislike Ron the Death Eater trope that is on several fanfics, because it makes a character eviler than they are in canon (usually) without any explanation.
It's not bad but it is often misused or misunderstood, usually by taking it way too literally. It just means you need to maintain stakes and dramatic tension when you alter the characters, and one of the best ways to do that is to alter the story to provide more and better challenges for them."If you give Frodo a lightsaber you should then give Sauron a Death Star" is an old, bad piece of writing advice.
Karamon Majere is indeed Chad. Like.However, in my mind, I have several archetypes of Lawful Good Chads: Caramon Majere from Dragonlance; Corgan from Septerra Core; Kyosuke Kasuga from KOR; Terry Bogard from SNK. But maybe I have a distorted idea of a Lawful Good and Chad archetypes.
Lawful Evil? Vult? Kurinou-Chads, we can put Vult in the Lawful Evil range?
It's also hard to portray an LG character in a way most people can agree on. To go to the source of the whole alignment thing, in DnD, Bytopia and Arcadia are both planes containing Lawful-Good inhabitants, but they are fundamentally different from each other, and in turn are different from the people going to the "pure" LG plane, Mount Celestia. When do they prioritize law, when good? What if those ideals clash?I don't think it's that hard to write LG characters in general