Ret. General Yeager greets me at his home in Upstate New York, and sits down with me at the porch. His wife, Barbara, offers me a glass of sweet tea as she comes out and sits beside her husband.
Q: Thank you very much for agreeing to this interview, sir. I know this is far from your first.
A: Eh, what's one more? As long as it keeps future generations from forgetting the important things, I'm down for it.
Q: Alright then. Let's start with War Plan Teal. That was originally your idea, wasn't it?
A: Ideas aren't formed in a vacuum, kid. I made it with help from a few others, including some science fiction authors we invited over as part of a think tank. We spent the first three months after the Conquest Fleet's discovery working on the plan, refining it, seeing what could and couldn't work. We had to consider the capabilities of the invaders, their mentality, and what we could do to defend ourselves. Considering the amount of unknown variables, it wasn't easy.
Q: Could you go into detail?
A: Of course. First thing first, we had to throw out half the pre-existing defense plans for the US. Most of those involved invasions from other countries, or alliances of nations. Russia and China were the main ones, but we also have plans for invasions by a suddenly-hostile NATO, Mexico, and even Canada. I've had to read hundred-page documents on how we'd respond to an invasion by Russia with a new superweapon, or orbital platforms. Hell, I know how we'd handle a war with Iceland.
Thing is, those are pretty well-known variables. We know what weapons Ivan's packing, and a good idea as to how he'd use it. We know the logistical capabilities of China, and the manpower they can field. Catch my drift?
The document for alien invasion was six pages long, and started with 'Find God'.
Q: Did we think we were that seriously outmatched?
A: Well, the paper operated on the assumption that the aliens would have weapons that matched their other technological capabilities. After all, if a civilization can travel between stars within reasonable timespans, then they had a lot of material resources, and a lot of energy at their disposal. A single Race starship, when at max speed, has more energy behind it than half our total nuclear stockpile, though they never really thought to use it like that.
The fithp were closer to the initial tech estimation, though thankfully their manpower was lacking. If it was an invading species with the fithp's tech and the Race's numbers, we never would've stood a chance.
Q: Did you have that in mind while drafting War Plan Teal?
A: Not as much as one might think. The plan was more than just a contingency against alien invasion; it was a way to calm down the populace, to give the impression that we had things under control. If we'd gone and said 'There's no way in hell we're gonna win', then there would've been full-blown anarchy. Already there'd been riots and looting all over the country. Death cults committing mass-suicide, people attempting to murder politicians in order to 'appease the alien overlords'... we needed to calm things down, and War Plan Teal was the key to that.
And there was one thing that made us think we stood a chance: the aliens clearly wanted our planet.
Q: How could you know that?
A: If they wanted to just exterminate us, they could've sent an unmanned starship our way at a good chunk of light speed; it would've made Chixiclub look like a bad fart. And there were far better alternatives for resources than an inhabited planet with high gravity. No, it was clear that these guys weren't going to simply glass us. That meant they couldn't use the biggest guns we believed they could be packing, including nuclear weapons. Hard to settle a radioactive mudball, after all.
So, if they wanted our planet, they were going to have to send ground troops, and go lightly on just flattening us, lest they ruin the biosphere.
Q: What were the central tenets to the plan?
A: First, we decided to operate under the assumption that the aliens would use orbital bombardment against us. Not enough to plunge us into nuclear winter, but something that would cripple our infrastructure. That meant we had to deal with the possibility that all of our missile silos, bases, roads, and ships could be hit near-simultaneously, in a surgical strike. One of the authors actually developed such a system a while back, called Thor.
So, how do you protect yourself against orbital bombardment? That was a question we had to answer in War Plan Teal.
Q: What did the plan dictate, then?
A: First, we had to deal with the likelihood that our navy would be neutralized; they'd be sitting ducks out there. We scrapped plans to build the Gerald R. Ford class of carriers, and decommissioned a few of the older ships. We instead focused on producing more submarines. After all, what's a better shield from orbital detection than a mile of water?
Still, we needed ships for transportation and force projection, so we kept those. If the enemy wasn't capable of hitting them, or we hit them hard enough to neutralize their orbital superiority, then we could roll them out at a moment's notice.
It's part of the reason why we recommissioned the Iowa-class battleships. Despite their limited force projection when compared to carriers or destroyers, they were much more heavily armored than any modern ship, and their guns would be able to punch a hole in all but the most durable alien equipment we'd projected.
We also made plans to shut down any and all bridges in the country, should the aliens bombard us. The highway overpasses we considered, but it would've been far too costly, especially considering what other preparations we needed to make.
Q: Which were?
A: First, we needed manpower. The total armed forces were a fraction of their potential max, since there was no need. Now, however, we had to deal with the possibility that we'd need to give everything we got.
We were to pull all forces from overseas within two months. Then, we'd begin conscription within the year. The last -and first- time we were ever in a total war economy was during WWII, and that was for less than four years. We didn't feel like trying to see how far we could stretch that, lest we cause economic collapse.
So, we said we'd ease into it over the course of two years. We'd start conscripting more and more men, we'd start diverting more and more GDP to production of weapons and equipment, and we'd bring back a lot of things from WWII. Victory gardens, war bonds, the like.
Weapons development would speed up like clockwork. MBTs would just be good targets for orbital bombardment, so we said to focus on lighter, faster armor. We planned on pouring billions into camouflage that'd work from orbit, using satellites to test their effectiveness. We hoped the combination would be enough to reduce casualties from ortillery.
For aircraft, we suggested applying ablative coatings, especially over the fuel tanks. Odds were, we figured, the aliens would probably have something similar to the YAL-1 or COIL, and we needed a countermeasure against such a possibility.
Of course, we weren't just focusing on a way to protect from orbital bombardment; we had plans for neutralizing it, too.
Q: You mean the railguns?
A: Yep. The Navy was working on a prototype for a while, now, and we decided that it would be a key defense weapon. Already the prototype could fire rounds at hypersonic speeds, with a range of a hundred miles. Of course, that was only a twenty-three pound projectile; we were looking at something bigger. Instead of a small one for ships, you could make a sedentary one, which meant you could pump in a whole lot more power. Instead of twenty-three pounds, you could fire a twenty-three hundred pound projectile. That's as much energy as a ton of TNT, with a fraction of the cost.
That means you could efficiently, and effectively, use them to shoot at targets in LEO. That's Low-Earth-Orbit, in case you didn't know. The velocity of the projectiles would be reduced at such altitudes, but that would still be bad news for any alien spacecraft in orbit.
The plan called for at least ten of these placed around the country, in strategic locations. We also suggested placing the things in Western Europe, to protect our NATO allies without needing boots on the ground. We dubbed them anti-orbital munitions, but the boys on the ground ended up calling them Ow Guns.
Q: What about supplies?
A: I see you've done your fair share of research. The plan covered that as well. We said we'd need to rewrite trade agreements with other countries, having them consider the possibility that the aliens could completely disrupt trade between countries, and even within the larger nations. Good luck trying to get a food truck from Florida to Minnesota when a tungsten rod could smash into it at any time.
Coupled with the fact that the world only had enough grained stored to feed everyone for two months, we could be looking at widespread famine.
So, we said there needed to be rationing throughout the country. We'd grow crops that could feed people efficiently, instead of growing things like cotton for textiles. Meat production was to be reduced considerably, since farmland is more efficient than a pasture. We also had to conserve fuel for generators, so we encouraged renewable energy sources, especially if the aliens knew to hit our petroleum deposits.
We also decided that, if we had surpluses even after making reserves, then we'd ship those to countries that needed it. After all, many small or arid countries didn't have enough farmland to feed their own people, or enough material to fuel a war economy.
Q: Did that include countries the US was not allied with?
A: Reluctantly, yes. If a place like North Korea or Syria were to fall, we thought, then that meant the aliens had a beach head from which to launch invasions of nearby countries with reduced resistance. After all, it'd be easier to unload troops or armor if there was nothing shooting at them.
Of course, we weren't stupid. We'd give them food, but not weapons. We knew there was a possibility that they'd just use it against us, once the war was over. If we won, anyway.
Q: Did the plan account for other countries, then?
A: Yes. We decided to include a call for a mutual defense pact with Canada, Mexico, and Brazil, operating as part of the beach head policy. If any of them were invaded, we'd send troops to help them fight the aliens off. It was much like a modern day version of the Munroe Doctrine, except on a bigger scale.
Other countries did the same. A few Middle-Eastern nations did it, though they excluded Israel, naturally. The EU did it, and Russia made a similar deal with China. I believe the African Union did the same, even though they knew they probably wouldn't be able to back it up like we could.
Q: What were reactions to the plan when it was unveiled?
A: Mixed. Some called it 'hyper-aggressive' and 'paranoid', saying that we still didn't know if the aliens were coming with hostile intent. They criticized the idea of putting the US in total war economy, since that meant giving up a lot of creature comforts, and even those who agreed on the idea of a defense plan said that it wasn't a good plan, that it was too defeatist.
Q: Why was it considered defeatist, or a bad plan altogether?
A: Well, they felt we were focusing too much on the likelihood of getting our asses kicked. We called for only defending the most important parts of the country. We knew it'd be impractical to defend the whole US; it's too damn big. Why waste lives and equipment fighting for some sparsely populated bit of Kansas, when you could better use it defending the missile silos or major population centers?
We also made many evacuation plans, dealing with what would happen if New York was gone, or if the enemy captured Washington. We also had to contend with the possibility of losing all our satellites and other methods of modern communication. We had plans for using carrier pigeons and honest-to-god telegraphs, since it'd be hard to disrupt that, when compared to satellite or radio towers. Can't use an EMP on a dove, after all.
I must commend the President for selling the plan to the people. I know a lot of people didn't like him at the time, but he was an intelligent man, and he knew that the plan was our best hope.
When other countries praised the plan and started adapting it to their own defense policies, people started quieting down. Of course, we made some changes. People liked the railguns, so we got a higher budget for making them, and we also diverted some money to EMP hardening of civilian hardware. I still disagree with the cyber-warfare countermeasures we made; the odds of aliens hacking into the Pentagon was absurd, even if they were high-tech.
Still, I knew the plan wasn't a solve-all.
Q: Care to explain?
A: Whoever controls the orbitals, controls the war. That much was clear from the get-go. Even with the railguns, the enemy would still have a firm grasp on the ultimate high-ground. And the reports about the ship near Saturn had me very concerned, if what some of the writers and scientists said meant anything. They proved to be true, unfortunately.
Unless we could get control of orbit, I felt, there was no way of winning the war.
But how would you get weapons into orbit? I knew we wouldn't be able to repeal the treaties against putting weapons in orbit, especially nuclear ones. Good luck trying to convince Russia to let us put nukes in orbit.
So, that was when we decided to propose Project: Archangel. We knew it would be the key to victory.
If we stood a chance, that is.