• The regular administrative staff are taking a vacation, and in the meantime, Biigoh is taking over. See here for more information.
  • A notice about Rule 3 regarding sites hosting pirated/unauthorized content has been made. Please see here for details.
  • Staff is working to deal with the problem of synonymous tags. See here for more information and to suggest tag mergers.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.

People are using AI but not disclosing it. How do you detect it ?

The hostile attack on people using AI in this exact thread is proof positive that most people will not admit to using it in fear of ridicule.
 
Last edited:
NumberSix said:
The hostile attack on people using AI in this exact thread is proof positive that most people will not admit to using it in fear of ridicule.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
"Hostile attack" You, amongst others are in an anti-AI thread about AI usage disclosure, constantly arguing against people who wish for nothing more than to avoid AI stories. If you see people being vocal against AI, it is only due to your own behavior.

The scope of the thread is AI usage disclosure, yet people cannot help but glorify AI usage, and defend the UNETHICAL use of AI (that being undisclosed AI stories).

I get it, you amongst others have a different opinion than me in regards to AI, but let's have some self reflection here. If I went to a pro-AI thread and acted the way you people are acting in this thread, do you think that won't have any effect on the discussion?
 
GatoArc said:
"Hostile attack" You, amongst others are in an anti-AI thread about AI usage disclosure, constantly arguing against people who wish for nothing more than to avoid AI stories. If you see people being vocal against AI, it is only due to your own behavior.

The scope of the thread is AI usage disclosure, yet people cannot help but glorify AI usage, and defend the UNETHICAL use of AI (that being undisclosed AI stories).

I get it, you amongst others have a different opinion than me in regards to AI, but let's have some self reflection here. If I went to a pro-AI thread and acted the way you people are acting in this thread, do you think that won't have any effect on the discussion?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Well, when people decide to try to shape the forum's policy to authorize a hostile attack, then you will see the crowd in favor of civility arguing against it.

Also no. AI usage might be lazy or tell that the person don't trust their own writing, but it isn't unethical. If AI usage is unethical, so it is photography, 3D modeling and others.
They are doing it easy in computer and machines instead of BLEEDING their fingers like every 'true artist'.
 
Lightbringer said:
Also no. AI usage might be lazy or tell that the person don't trust their own writing, but it isn't unethical. If AI usage is unethical, so it is photography, 3D modeling and others.
They are doing it easy in computer and machines instead of BLEEDING their fingers like every 'true artist'.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Dude come on, I even placed it in parenthesis of what I considered to be unethical AI usage. This is the 2nd time you've done me dirty.
Lightbringer said:
Well, when people decide to try to shape the forum's policy to authorize a hostile attack, then you will see the crowd in favor of civility arguing against it.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
This is fiction. No one here is doing that, you invented a scenario in your head and ran with it.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top