Questionable Questing

Well the only way to rectify this is by promoting more genderbending transhumanist yuri/futa eh? *nudges Fiona and wink winks*

(just to be clear I'm talking about Come Back Haunted)

I've got a draft for it that's maybe 1/3rd done. Concentrating on my main quest for now, mostly, but...

At some point I should probably speculate on potential 'level-up' parasite powers. Sex isn't as interesting to me as kink, so it'd help.

Sounds interesting

Also Fiona confirmed for Graphomania kink

This is exactly why I subscribe to the 'dictatorship' style of quest-running, by the way.

GG is the cutest lewd dictator yes

Yeah, I'm trying not to go off in the actual quest thread because it's not my quest and getting overly angry about votes isn't my style.

Just, uh, bloody hell. Especially that '20 years' line. I feel especially bad for the QM after the whole 'oh yeah I'm recovering from depression so I'd rather *not* write a bloody goddamned suicide because people don't like the quest fetish' thing.

Yeah that's just grating. ngl I was sort of tempted to go on a rant on that topic myself in-thread if only because I have strong feelings when it comes to how a QM gets to run their quest.

GG and Fiona sitting a tree Q-M-ING!

oh hush you

Never! Kohai will forever remain adorable and bulliable!

LEWD!!!

Current thread status: "I've said it before and I'll say it again: democracy simply doesn't work."

I suppose it could've been avoided by changing the way the vote was set up, but hindsight is 20/20 and it's hardly the QM's fault when they've been clear this whole time...

A single person (the quest runner) is smart. A collective (the players) is dumb!

I read a enough of stories written by single, to know that both sides can be equally stupid.

Sturgeon's Law and the Law of Averages: 90% of actions taken are stupid. As you tend to a larger sample size and less filtering, you tend to the average.

That being said, there are probably ways to cut down on the stupid. Not having out-of-character or out-of-tone options would be one possibility. Weighting votes might be another.

Why was that an option anyways? But more importantly, why would someone show up to something that says "this will have yuri" and. Well. "Oh no there's yuri like it said."

Is there a way to threadban griefers? I'd assume people who keep trying to hijack a story after it being made clear "yes it says there's yuri on the cover, yes the protagonist is a cute girl who will do cute girls" generally fall under the category of bad faith participants, right under "people who trash your work in a strictly unhelpful way" (flamers)