• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Search results for query: *

  1. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    That's an absurd argument. You can watch porn and still have moral problems against other kinds of porn, I mean child porn is a thing or revenge porn. Fair enough I guess.

  2. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    I was commenting on the anology used by the other person, about people balancing on ladders and looking at other people's houses. What I mean is that, while yes the forum is owned by a person and we have to follow rules, it isn't a case of me going out of my way to be mad about something, I...

  3. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    Public in the sense that it is a public for its users.

  4. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    While the mods have made their policies clear so I am going to keep quite about the topic. But this a fallacious argument at best. It isn't someone watching into someone's home, this is a public forum, so it's more like walking inside the town Square and getting offended by someone doing that...

  5. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    Thats a fair criticism. Hmm I have been complaining a bit. I still maintain that religion is inherently political since a vast majority of humans is religious and it influences a lot of world politics. But I guess if there is no rule specifically I doubt the powers that be are going to...

  6. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    Are you seriously arguing that America government is separate from church. Because that's a laughable sentiment. I won't argue it here because this is definitely against the rules but you can PM me for it. I am not ranting, I have been calm addressing each of the points raised by you and I...

  7. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    Thats all religion. It's all deritive material from oral histories. It's still a representation of the same ideal. I was thinking it was very political, since religion and politics and basically the same thing. The forum isn't also a set up to damage other people's beliefs. It's a topic...

  8. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    Religion will cause just as many arguments and it isn't fundamental to what the site does as well. I didn't report it for rule 1 since none of the people in the story exist. Unless the site recently changed its focus to be a anime focused forum, it's not. You can discuss anything here. If it...

  9. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    Ok I am actively working so the reply will be short. It have read cambrian fic, I enjoy there work myself. I don't particularly hold it against the person, nor do I have the right to hold it against someone when I don't know ow there circumstances they are getting payed, you got to to do what...

  10. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    I actually do have to leave to do my work but I can respond tomorrow.

  11. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    No, I am type of person who would rather do this because I think it's a fair topic to be discussed openly rather than do my actual work for my classes that is due in like 12 hours. I do this because I think it's worth it. And there has been nothing offensive or bannable in any of the...

  12. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    I mean I can call for preachers to banned if that's a big deal for you. Where do you want me to do It.as for your first point. He is using Hindu mythology and legends. People and cultures have ownership over their symbols, if he is appropriateing their symbols and preventing them he is infact...

  13. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    They are not infact my religious views and I have no problem with you. You are clearly projecting your prior bad experience onto me and I don't think i deserve that. Also Hinduism doesn't have anything against you I would think, the nationalist probably will but not the religion itself. I don't...

  14. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    No, all of their depiction in nasu is a problem. But I am not talking about what a piece of shit that guy is. The fact that you ignore all the people by complaining they are Hindu nationalist means that you want to ignore the problem rather than addressing the issue. And other people don't...

  15. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    It's not that I find it offensive, it is the fact that it's a billion people would find it offensive. The sheer numbers alone would be a cause to give weight to the words beside from the practical problem that people find it offensive will express this constantly and loudly, and be disruptive.

  16. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    Wow assumptions much. I am infact not a Hindu for your kind information nor do I belive in that faith. I am pointing this out because it very offensive and hurts people, just like slurs. It is the same situation, certain usages of words hurt people.

  17. Serious concerns about depictions of Actively Worshiped Religious figures in NSFW situations.

    So I don't want to name any names but I recently came across a story that Depicted a Hindu God as a, some sort of mindbroken slut. I duly reported that because I thought he why cause a fuss. I Thought the matter would be soon resolved because it's clearly and insulting depiction and really...
Back
Top