• The regular administrative staff are taking a vacation, and in the meantime, Biigoh is taking over. See here for more information.
  • A notice about Rule 3 regarding sites hosting pirated/unauthorized content has been made. Please see here for details.
  • Staff is working to deal with the problem of synonymous tags. See here for more information and to suggest tag mergers.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.

DCU: Blacklist

Reader mode
Samael61 said:
He took a long, slow breath to still his heart. "What I did should not constitute anything to be punished by him." He was not a wicked individual, unless throwing Vandal Savage to the sun counted as wicked.

"Not him directly. The fate you consigned the immortal to have changed too many events in the future. You have presumed to override fate. This was a mere warning for your hubris," the Phantom Stranger warned.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Fuck free will, am I right? I never understood how fate and destiny could have a role in DC when the biblical God is around with their whole "free will" thing. I mean I guess I can see how it would work out as a "you have free will, but your actions have consequences" kind of thing, but it feels like a cheap way for the writers to maintain the status quo. I get that the big G isn't against this kind of thing and only his minions are throwing a hissy fit, but it still rubs me wrong.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 2 more.
    • Total: 7 (members: 6, guests: 1)
    Back
    Top