• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • The regular administrative staff are taking a vacation, and in the meantime, Biigoh is taking over. See here for more information.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Governor's Gambit - Star Wars SI into Imperial Governor

Kuat steals Myto's LECA design, retroactively backdates their own inferior version so it's the older but unadorned model and imply that Myto simple adapted available less successful KDY Design. Produces an improved version copied wholesale from Myto and call it an improvement over the original that Myto copied, then reap the benefits as KDY gets the Contracts while Myto gets ignored
 
Last edited:
ALLIANCE INTELLIGENCE | THREAT ASSESMENT: MILITARY SUPPLEMENT New

ALLIANCE INTELLIGENCE | THREAT ASSESSMENT: NAVAL SUPPLEMENT

SUBJECT: Arbiter-Class Operational Hazards and Structural Vulnerabilities

DISTRIBUTION: Alliance High Command / Starfighter Command / Sector Cell Leads

AUTHORIZATION: Office of SpecForce Intelligence

CLASSIFICATION: High-Priority Tactical Brief






I. STRATEGIC THREAT ANALYSIS

The Arbiter-Class Heavy Cruiser-Carrier is specifically engineered to dismantle the foundational tactics of the Alliance. While a standard Star Destroyer acts as a blunt instrument for planetary subjugation, the Arbiter is a precision tool for sector-wide pacification.


  • Counter-Insurgency Doctrine: The vessel utilizes a carrier-first approach that directly negates our hit-and-run advantages. By prioritizing starfighter throughput over raw battery power, an Arbiter can maintain a persistent "no-fly zone" across a wide engagement radius, making it nearly impossible for our strike packages to achieve the local space superiority required for an extraction.
  • Anti-Piracy Heritage: Because it was designed to hunt mobile raiding bases, the Arbiter is exceptionally efficient at tracking and intercepting the low-signature logistical tails our cells rely on. Its inclusion of TIE-R Ranger units ensures that even if we jump to hyperspace, there is a high probability of being shadowed.




II. CRITICAL WEAKNESSES AND PRODUCTION FAILURES

Despite its tactical utility, the Arbiter is a product of desperation and rushed industrial cycles. Intelligence confirms these hulls are being completed in only 2.5 months, leading to several exploitable flaws.


  • Absence of Ion Weaponry: In a staggering production oversight, the Arbiter features no ion cannons. It lacks any organic capacity to disable our vessels non-lethally or efficiently suppress high-output shield generators. Alliance commanders should exploit this "Ion Gap" by utilizing electronic warfare suites, as the Arbiter has no way to "fire back" in the electronic spectrum.
  • Personnel Deficiency: While the fighter pilots are elite, the naval crews are significantly subpar. Due to Oversector Command drawing away veteran personnel and denying mass deployment of properly trained sailors, the Arbiter is currently manned by green sailors rushed through makeshift academies. Expect slow response times to hull breaches, poor gunnery accuracy, and a general lack of composure during sustained boarding actions.
  • Structural Fragility: The 2.5-month construction window suggests a lack of internal reinforcement. The recessed Victory-style bridge module, while reducing the silhouette, creates a localized stress point. A concentrated torpedo strike at the junction between the bridge neck and the primary hangar deck is likely to cause catastrophic decompression.




III. ENGAGEMENT ADVISORY

The Arbiter is a "glass carrier"—it can project an elite, Edin-trained fighter wing that will decimate our starfighters, but the ship itself is structurally and operationally vulnerable.

Tactical Recommendation: Do not engage the fighter wing directly. Utilize Y-Wing or B-Wing elements to prioritize ion strikes against the Arbiter's hangar bay doors. By jamming the launch racks, you trap their best assets, the pilots, inside a hull manned by a crew that doesn't yet know how to save it.

IV. STARFIGHTER CORPS ANALYSIS: THE MYTO VARIANTS

While the capital fleet suffers from rushed construction, the starfighter complement represents a more calculated threat. The "M-Pattern" refits are designed to close the traditional gap between Imperial mass-production and Alliance durability.


  • Enhanced Survivability: The addition of shielding and integrated life support to TIE-M and TIE/IN-M units has effectively neutralized our "one-pass" kill advantage. Pilots are reporting that these units can withstand grazing hits that would disintegrate a standard TIE/ln, necessitating sustained target tracking.
  • The Edin Factor: Intelligence confirms that the TIE pilots graduated from the Edin Military Academy. Unlike the green crews aboard the Arbiter-class, these pilots are highly disciplined and possess tactical proficiency exceeding standard Imperial Navy averages.
  • TIE-W Whirlwind "Black-Tier" Warning: The Whirlwind is a purpose-built interceptor utilizing rotary wing assemblies to create unpredictable firing arcs.
    • Engagement Scale: A single Whirlwind is manageable but dangerous; expect at least one to three casualties to secure a kill. However, a full squadron (12 units) creates a lethal saturation zone.
    • Standing Order: Do not engage Whirlwind squadrons without high-quality capital ship support to provide a flak screen. If unassisted, immediate tactical withdrawal is the only sanctioned response.




V. GROUND ASSET EVALUATION: THE LECA PLATFORM

The Light Expeditionary Combat Armor (LECA) serves as the primary mobile support element for the Line Companies. Its deployment is intended to provide heavy firepower in environments where larger walkers are physically constrained.


  • Bureaucratic Containment: Due to successful long-term efforts by Alliance assets within the Imperial Army Procurement Office, the LECA is currently dismissed by the Core World high command as "backwater scrap." This perception has successfully limited its proliferation, though it remains a staple in the Myto and Braxant sectors.
  • Tactical Versatility: The LECA's modular hardpoints allow it to cycle through anti-infantry, anti-armor, and AA roles with minimal downtime. Its bipedal agility makes it a significant threat during boarding actions against Alliance blockade runners.





VI. ENGAGEMENT DOCTRINE: LECA COUNTERMEASURES (THEORETICAL)

Priority Note: Alliance SpecForce currently lacks direct combat telemetry against the LECA platform due to limited proliferation and a lack of active ground operations within the Myto or Braxant sectors. The following protocols are derived from technical schematics and simulated humanoid-frame stress tests.

Tactical Environment and Deployment

Field analysts must assume the LECA will rarely be encountered as a localized solo threat. Standard Imperial doctrine for the platform emphasizes a symbiotic infantry link. The walker provides the heavy fire-chamber and mobile cover, while the accompanying infantry squad protects the walker's rear and flank blind spots. Do not attempt to isolate the walker without first suppressing the supporting fire-team.

Projected Vulnerabilities


  • Balance and Center of Gravity: While the humanoid frame allows for superior traversal of uneven terrain compared to traditional bipedal scout walkers, it is susceptible to similar balance disruptions as humanoids in general. High-impact kinetic strikes or localized seismic charges are projected to cause stumble-state failures. Targeting the ankle-actuators or knee-servos during a lateral movement phase could result in a total platform tip-over.
    • Note: It is unknown if the LECA contains extensive enough internal technology to achieve superior balance over standard humanoids that would negate such tactics. However, the platform's size and focus on maintenance simplicity indicates this is unlikely.
  • Optics and Sensor Overload: Unlike the narrow viewing ports of larger walkers, the LECA appears to rely on a centralized sensor pod for the pilot's HUD. Standard Alliance flash-bangs or high-intensity ion flares are theorized to be effective against this smaller, more sensitive array.
  • Shield Limitations: Technical data indicates the forward-facing shield generator is a directional wedge rather than a full bubble. This suggests a critical vulnerability to flanking maneuvers or ambushes. If the infantry screen can be broken, a single thermal detonator to the rear power-coupling is the theorized best kill-method for units without heavier firepower.
Combat Recommendation: The Tri-Point Trap

In the absence of field experience, SpecForce suggests a staggered engagement. Use a bait unit to draw the LECA's forward shield and primary weapons fire, while two flanking elements target the platform's unshielded rear with explosives or other heavy ordnance.


Warning: Avoid cable-tether tactics used against heavy walkers. The LECA's humanoid arms allow it to potentially catch or brace itself against terrain, making cable-tripping an unreliable strategy.






VII. COVERT ACQUISITION AND MODIFICATION (LCUW)

The Alliance continues to exploit the sector's industrial output through the purchase of LCUW (Civilian Utility) models from independent manufacturers like Khagan Motors.


  • The "Slapdash" Conversion: These civilian frames are regularly modified by our technicians into improvised combat walkers. By utilizing the modular "Common Tool Interface," we can mount salvaged laser cannons or rocket pods.
  • Operational Limits: These converted units are inherently inferior to the factory-spec military LECA-A series. They lack the structural reinforcement and integrated shield harmonics of the Imperial models. They are best utilized as mobile fire-support platforms for urban ambushes rather than frontline brawlers.




VIII. STRATEGIC SUMMARY

The Myto Sector represents a unique logistical paradox for the Alliance. While the local military output is hazardous, the sector's administrative stability is essential to our broader regional efforts.


  • The Rusty Refit Mandate: Alliance High Command's primary objective in the Myto Sector is the protection and expansion of the Rusty Refit Orbital Yard. This facility has evolved into a vital logistical hub for the North and North-East regions of the galaxy. Its continued operation as a "clean" public-private partnership is a top-tier priority, any action that risks exposing our control of the yard is strictly prohibited.
  • Containment Strategy: The containment of Myto-pattern technologies (Arbiter, LECA, Whirlwind) remains a concern, but it is one that requires minimal direct interference. The Core-Centric attitudes of the Imperial Procurement Office and the Core World elite do the majority of our work for us. Their inherent disdain for "Rim-built scrap" ensures that these superior designs remain isolated.
  • Operational Directive: Alliance assets are to focus on subtle, psychological pushes within the Imperial bureaucracy to reinforce these biases. We must maintain the status quo. A prosperous, stable Myto Sector that both ensures our own logistical tail while preventing the betterment of Imperial military doctrine.





FIELD ADVISORY: Maintain low-profile signatures. Do not provoke Sector Patrol. Ensure the Rusty Refit remains the invisible spine of our Northern logistics.
 
Structural Fragility: The 2.5-month construction window suggests a lack of internal reinforcement. The recessed Victory-style bridge module, while reducing the silhouette, creates a localized stress point. A concentrated torpedo strike at the junction between the bridge neck and the primary hangar deck is likely to cause catastrophic decompression.

So is the alliance command just wrong / using wishful thinking here? Basically are they basing this off other shipyards cost cutting to rush products? Why would the sector not give their mega important military ship which is being pushed to solve a strategic gap internal reinforcement? Additionally the recessed bridge, isn't this just Las and his designers working to not have the big target of the bridge neck area? Why does everyone seem to assume they wouldn't reinforce the new location?

I'm confused since this is a out of sector view point. Are they wrong with skewed viewpoints? Or are they ships actually crap structurally?
 
Absence of Ion Weaponry: In a staggering production oversight, the Arbiter features no ion cannons. It lacks any organic capacity to disable our vessels non-lethally or efficiently suppress high-output shield generators. Alliance commanders should exploit this "Ion Gap" by utilizing electronic warfare suites, as the Arbiter has no way to "fire back" in the electronic spectrum.
Puts Ion weapons on TIEs

Rebels: "Wait that's cheating!"
Tactical Recommendation: Do not engage the fighter wing directly. Utilize Y-Wing or B-Wing elements to prioritize ion strikes against the Arbiter's hangar bay doors. By jamming the launch racks, you trap their best assets, the pilots, inside a hull manned by a crew that doesn't yet know how to save it.
Sounds like a great plan. Against a single lone Arbiter that doesn't know you're coming. Be a shame if they were put into small flotilla with lots of PD.
The Edin Factor: Intelligence confirms that the TIE pilots graduated from the Edin Military Academy. Unlike the green crews aboard the Arbiter-class, these pilots are highly disciplined and possess tactical proficiency exceeding standard Imperial Navy averages.
So proud of that former crime ridden cesspool.
TIE-W Whirlwind "Black-Tier" Warning: The Whirlwind is a purpose-built interceptor utilizing rotary wing assemblies to create unpredictable firing arcs.
  • Engagement Scale: A single Whirlwind is manageable but dangerous; expect at least one to three casualties to secure a kill. However, a full squadron (12 units) creates a lethal saturation zone.
  • Standing Order: Do not engage Whirlwind squadrons without high-quality capital ship support to provide a flak screen. If unassisted, immediate tactical withdrawal is the only sanctioned response.
The one Mindan creation the Rebels are most afraid of. Kind of funny considering the sheer relative quantity of the others that can be pumped out.
Bureaucratic Containment: Due to successful long-term efforts by Alliance assets within the Imperial Army Procurement Office, the LECA is currently dismissed by the Core World high command as "backwater scrap." This perception has successfully limited its proliferation, though it remains a staple in the Myto and Braxant sectors.
Would be really funny if that "backwater scrap" reputation bleeds over to the New Republic. Falling victim to their own propaganda. After all, most of the Core World politicians who are going to be put in charge will have only heard bad things about the LECA, so why would put the budget towards humanoid walker development?
Field analysts must assume the LECA will rarely be encountered as a localized solo threat
Very dangerous assumption to make. Wait until they encounter multiple LECAs in the same area.
The "Slapdash" Conversion: These civilian frames are regularly modified by our technicians into improvised combat walkers. By utilizing the modular "Common Tool Interface," we can mount salvaged laser cannons or rocket pods.
That will probably contribute to the "backwater scrap" reputation and the bleed over to the New Republic. Most of the video they will have of "LECAs" in action are going to be these "Slapdash" Conversions.
 
Very dangerous assumption to make. Wait until they encounter multiple LECAs in the same area.

The warring is about LECAs never being alone and that standar imperial docrine is to allways pare them up with infantry support. Not that LECAs never show up in numbers.
 
Las' domain is both a blessing and a nightmare to the Alliance. A hotbed of economic prosperity and technological innovation.

May their efforts to isolate his sector's tech succeed, and continue to protect their forces from them and sip upon the mech market to fight the rest of the Empire.

There is a problem though, the Myto and Braxant sector is still going to get saturated by them, and their successes will eventually have Hiral wanting them to supplement his limited Star Destroyer forces. In which some improved versions will get gifted to Kaine, and now the Oversector fleet's Executor will have a pursuit group of swift carriers to harry rebel/pirate groups long enough for it to arrive.

Good luck to the Alliance in trying to invade the Oversector later, there's gonna be so many of those things to supplement the loss of Star Destroyer production
 

ALLIANCE INTELLIGENCE | THREAT ASSESSMENT: NAVAL SUPPLEMENT

SUBJECT: Arbiter-Class Operational Hazards and Structural Vulnerabilities

DISTRIBUTION: Alliance High Command / Starfighter Command / Sector Cell Leads

AUTHORIZATION: Office of SpecForce Intelligence

CLASSIFICATION: High-Priority Tactical Brief






I. STRATEGIC THREAT ANALYSIS

The Arbiter-Class Heavy Cruiser-Carrier is specifically engineered to dismantle the foundational tactics of the Alliance. While a standard Star Destroyer acts as a blunt instrument for planetary subjugation, the Arbiter is a precision tool for sector-wide pacification.


  • Counter-Insurgency Doctrine: The vessel utilizes a carrier-first approach that directly negates our hit-and-run advantages. By prioritizing starfighter throughput over raw battery power, an Arbiter can maintain a persistent "no-fly zone" across a wide engagement radius, making it nearly impossible for our strike packages to achieve the local space superiority required for an extraction.
  • Anti-Piracy Heritage: Because it was designed to hunt mobile raiding bases, the Arbiter is exceptionally efficient at tracking and intercepting the low-signature logistical tails our cells rely on. Its inclusion of TIE-R Ranger units ensures that even if we jump to hyperspace, there is a high probability of being shadowed.




II. CRITICAL WEAKNESSES AND PRODUCTION FAILURES

Despite its tactical utility, the Arbiter is a product of desperation and rushed industrial cycles. Intelligence confirms these hulls are being completed in only 2.5 months, leading to several exploitable flaws.


  • Absence of Ion Weaponry: In a staggering production oversight, the Arbiter features no ion cannons. It lacks any organic capacity to disable our vessels non-lethally or efficiently suppress high-output shield generators. Alliance commanders should exploit this "Ion Gap" by utilizing electronic warfare suites, as the Arbiter has no way to "fire back" in the electronic spectrum.
  • Personnel Deficiency: While the fighter pilots are elite, the naval crews are significantly subpar. Due to Oversector Command drawing away veteran personnel and denying mass deployment of properly trained sailors, the Arbiter is currently manned by green sailors rushed through makeshift academies. Expect slow response times to hull breaches, poor gunnery accuracy, and a general lack of composure during sustained boarding actions.
  • Structural Fragility: The 2.5-month construction window suggests a lack of internal reinforcement. The recessed Victory-style bridge module, while reducing the silhouette, creates a localized stress point. A concentrated torpedo strike at the junction between the bridge neck and the primary hangar deck is likely to cause catastrophic decompression.




III. ENGAGEMENT ADVISORY

The Arbiter is a "glass carrier"—it can project an elite, Edin-trained fighter wing that will decimate our starfighters, but the ship itself is structurally and operationally vulnerable.

Tactical Recommendation: Do not engage the fighter wing directly. Utilize Y-Wing or B-Wing elements to prioritize ion strikes against the Arbiter's hangar bay doors. By jamming the launch racks, you trap their best assets, the pilots, inside a hull manned by a crew that doesn't yet know how to save it.

IV. STARFIGHTER CORPS ANALYSIS: THE MYTO VARIANTS

While the capital fleet suffers from rushed construction, the starfighter complement represents a more calculated threat. The "M-Pattern" refits are designed to close the traditional gap between Imperial mass-production and Alliance durability.


  • Enhanced Survivability: The addition of shielding and integrated life support to TIE-M and TIE/IN-M units has effectively neutralized our "one-pass" kill advantage. Pilots are reporting that these units can withstand grazing hits that would disintegrate a standard TIE/ln, necessitating sustained target tracking.
  • The Edin Factor: Intelligence confirms that the TIE pilots graduated from the Edin Military Academy. Unlike the green crews aboard the Arbiter-class, these pilots are highly disciplined and possess tactical proficiency exceeding standard Imperial Navy averages.
  • TIE-W Whirlwind "Black-Tier" Warning: The Whirlwind is a purpose-built interceptor utilizing rotary wing assemblies to create unpredictable firing arcs.
    • Engagement Scale: A single Whirlwind is manageable but dangerous; expect at least one to three casualties to secure a kill. However, a full squadron (12 units) creates a lethal saturation zone.
    • Standing Order: Do not engage Whirlwind squadrons without high-quality capital ship support to provide a flak screen. If unassisted, immediate tactical withdrawal is the only sanctioned response.




V. GROUND ASSET EVALUATION: THE LECA PLATFORM

The Light Expeditionary Combat Armor (LECA) serves as the primary mobile support element for the Line Companies. Its deployment is intended to provide heavy firepower in environments where larger walkers are physically constrained.


  • Bureaucratic Containment: Due to successful long-term efforts by Alliance assets within the Imperial Army Procurement Office, the LECA is currently dismissed by the Core World high command as "backwater scrap." This perception has successfully limited its proliferation, though it remains a staple in the Myto and Braxant sectors.
  • Tactical Versatility: The LECA's modular hardpoints allow it to cycle through anti-infantry, anti-armor, and AA roles with minimal downtime. Its bipedal agility makes it a significant threat during boarding actions against Alliance blockade runners.





VI. ENGAGEMENT DOCTRINE: LECA COUNTERMEASURES (THEORETICAL)

Priority Note: Alliance SpecForce currently lacks direct combat telemetry against the LECA platform due to limited proliferation and a lack of active ground operations within the Myto or Braxant sectors. The following protocols are derived from technical schematics and simulated humanoid-frame stress tests.

Tactical Environment and Deployment

Field analysts must assume the LECA will rarely be encountered as a localized solo threat. Standard Imperial doctrine for the platform emphasizes a symbiotic infantry link. The walker provides the heavy fire-chamber and mobile cover, while the accompanying infantry squad protects the walker's rear and flank blind spots. Do not attempt to isolate the walker without first suppressing the supporting fire-team.

Projected Vulnerabilities


  • Balance and Center of Gravity: While the humanoid frame allows for superior traversal of uneven terrain compared to traditional bipedal scout walkers, it is susceptible to similar balance disruptions as humanoids in general. High-impact kinetic strikes or localized seismic charges are projected to cause stumble-state failures. Targeting the ankle-actuators or knee-servos during a lateral movement phase could result in a total platform tip-over.
    • Note: It is unknown if the LECA contains extensive enough internal technology to achieve superior balance over standard humanoids that would negate such tactics. However, the platform's size and focus on maintenance simplicity indicates this is unlikely.
  • Optics and Sensor Overload: Unlike the narrow viewing ports of larger walkers, the LECA appears to rely on a centralized sensor pod for the pilot's HUD. Standard Alliance flash-bangs or high-intensity ion flares are theorized to be effective against this smaller, more sensitive array.
  • Shield Limitations: Technical data indicates the forward-facing shield generator is a directional wedge rather than a full bubble. This suggests a critical vulnerability to flanking maneuvers or ambushes. If the infantry screen can be broken, a single thermal detonator to the rear power-coupling is the theorized best kill-method for units without heavier firepower.
Combat Recommendation: The Tri-Point Trap

In the absence of field experience, SpecForce suggests a staggered engagement. Use a bait unit to draw the LECA's forward shield and primary weapons fire, while two flanking elements target the platform's unshielded rear with explosives or other heavy ordnance.


Warning: Avoid cable-tether tactics used against heavy walkers. The LECA's humanoid arms allow it to potentially catch or brace itself against terrain, making cable-tripping an unreliable strategy.






VII. COVERT ACQUISITION AND MODIFICATION (LCUW)

The Alliance continues to exploit the sector's industrial output through the purchase of LCUW (Civilian Utility) models from independent manufacturers like Khagan Motors.


  • The "Slapdash" Conversion: These civilian frames are regularly modified by our technicians into improvised combat walkers. By utilizing the modular "Common Tool Interface," we can mount salvaged laser cannons or rocket pods.
  • Operational Limits: These converted units are inherently inferior to the factory-spec military LECA-A series. They lack the structural reinforcement and integrated shield harmonics of the Imperial models. They are best utilized as mobile fire-support platforms for urban ambushes rather than frontline brawlers.




VIII. STRATEGIC SUMMARY

The Myto Sector represents a unique logistical paradox for the Alliance. While the local military output is hazardous, the sector's administrative stability is essential to our broader regional efforts.


  • The Rusty Refit Mandate: Alliance High Command's primary objective in the Myto Sector is the protection and expansion of the Rusty Refit Orbital Yard. This facility has evolved into a vital logistical hub for the North and North-East regions of the galaxy. Its continued operation as a "clean" public-private partnership is a top-tier priority, any action that risks exposing our control of the yard is strictly prohibited.
  • Containment Strategy: The containment of Myto-pattern technologies (Arbiter, LECA, Whirlwind) remains a concern, but it is one that requires minimal direct interference. The Core-Centric attitudes of the Imperial Procurement Office and the Core World elite do the majority of our work for us. Their inherent disdain for "Rim-built scrap" ensures that these superior designs remain isolated.
  • Operational Directive: Alliance assets are to focus on subtle, psychological pushes within the Imperial bureaucracy to reinforce these biases. We must maintain the status quo. A prosperous, stable Myto Sector that both ensures our own logistical tail while preventing the betterment of Imperial military doctrine.





FIELD ADVISORY: Maintain low-profile signatures. Do not provoke Sector Patrol. Ensure the Rusty Refit remains the invisible spine of our Northern logistics.
Are we ever gonna see the other walkers that Minda R&D we're working on before the assassination attempt on las's life, he did give them permission to continue that didn't he?
 
Still hoping to see bespoke LECAs being commissioned by the Inquisitorius after Seventh Brother's success. Call them something like the "I-Series Advanced Combat models", numbered and tailored according to the Inquisitorial buyer.

So the Dread Unit would be the I-7 AC LECA.

You know, just to totally confuse the issue.
 
Damn Emperor Las Mola isn't gonna be a meme we're joking about anymore is it? Cause the Rebels and Imperial Remnants are gonna get their shit pushed in if either tries anything once the Empire falls apart.
It's really not a joke. Assuming we're in Legends continuity, what's going to happen about 10 days after the New Republic forms is a massive amount of balkanization. After all, no matter who is in charge, Coreworlders are going to Coreworld.

Las is, sooner rather than later, going to find himself in charge of an independent Imperial Remnant. I don't imagine that it will keep that status any longer than it will take for Las (and friends) to decide what to name it.
 
Last edited:
integrated life support
Most useless addition, honestly.
Imperial Pilot Suit comes with it's own life support designed for two days of operation. And pilots would need to wear the suit anyway, because TIE sensor suits feed the info to the helmet's HUD, which allows them to 'see through' the cockpit.
Installing life support into fighters can even be detrimential. It implies a pressurised cockpit, which will promt some idiot to take his helmet off. And if the standard TIE desintegrating around you isn't a big problem, you'll just need to hang around for some time untill a shuttle can pick you up... it's kinda hard to survive in space without oxygen if you don't wear a helmet.
Besides, there aren't that much situations that will need more than 2 days of life support, even long range recon, considering Star Wars ships can travel across galaxy twice in less than two days with a Class 3 hyperdrive.
 
Last edited:
I. STRATEGIC THREAT ANALYSIS

The Arbiter-Class Heavy Cruiser-Carrier is specifically engineered to dismantle the foundational tactics of the Alliance. While a standard Star Destroyer acts as a blunt instrument for planetary subjugation, the Arbiter is a precision tool for sector-wide pacification.


  • Counter-Insurgency Doctrine: The vessel utilizes a carrier-first approach that directly negates our hit-and-run advantages. By prioritizing starfighter throughput over raw battery power, an Arbiter can maintain a persistent "no-fly zone" across a wide engagement radius, making it nearly impossible for our strike packages to achieve the local space superiority required for an extraction.
  • Anti-Piracy Heritage: Because it was designed to hunt mobile raiding bases, the Arbiter is exceptionally efficient at tracking and intercepting the low-signature logistical tails our cells rely on. Its inclusion of TIE-R Ranger units ensures that even if we jump to hyperspace, there is a high probability of being shadowed.

Funny part here is how this is going to get way worse in the future for the Rebels... if they are slightly worried now then they would be shitting super dry bricks in the future.

I do so love to imagine Rebel command having to suddenly change their pants for some reason, but then again do i need more of reason than that they are rebel scum.

II. CRITICAL WEAKNESSES AND PRODUCTION FAILURES

Despite its tactical utility, the Arbiter is a product of desperation and rushed industrial cycles. Intelligence confirms these hulls are being completed in only 2.5 months, leading to several exploitable flaws.


  • Absence of Ion Weaponry: In a staggering production oversight, the Arbiter features no ion cannons. It lacks any organic capacity to disable our vessels non-lethally or efficiently suppress high-output shield generators. Alliance commanders should exploit this "Ion Gap" by utilizing electronic warfare suites, as the Arbiter has no way to "fire back" in the electronic spectrum.
  • Personnel Deficiency: While the fighter pilots are elite, the naval crews are significantly subpar. Due to Oversector Command drawing away veteran personnel and denying mass deployment of properly trained sailors, the Arbiter is currently manned by green sailors rushed through makeshift academies. Expect slow response times to hull breaches, poor gunnery accuracy, and a general lack of composure during sustained boarding actions.
  • Structural Fragility: The 2.5-month construction window suggests a lack of internal reinforcement. The recessed Victory-style bridge module, while reducing the silhouette, creates a localized stress point. A concentrated torpedo strike at the junction between the bridge neck and the primary hangar deck is likely to cause catastrophic decompression.

A few weaknesses that is only going to last for a small time until R&D get's more and more feedback from the field and ends up fixing the problems and creating a refit plan and Arbiter II-Class that they start producing while the then Arbiter I-Class's get the refit if they are on good working order, and if damaged at the time of the new plans and production most likely get scrapped and used for parts in the construction of the newer class.

This what i would suggest at least.

As for the personell deficiency that is only going to last in the current early phases of the Myto sector Imperial Academies where they are kind of trying to see what they can do in order to streamline the process to get adequate to Elite personell out of them, and we already know they produce Elite level Stormtroopers.

So conclusion is that the Naval personell problems are only temporary and our Moff has shown a dislike if not hate for incompetence and inefficiency, and his history has shown he will move to do what he can to fix the problem ASAP when he has more concrete reports on said problems... probably by hiring more retired Clones.

III. ENGAGEMENT ADVISORY

The Arbiter is a "glass carrier"—it can project an elite, Edin-trained fighter wing that will decimate our starfighters, but the ship itself is structurally and operationally vulnerable.

Tactical Recommendation: Do not engage the fighter wing directly. Utilize Y-Wing or B-Wing elements to prioritize ion strikes against the Arbiter's hangar bay doors. By jamming the launch racks, you trap their best assets, the pilots, inside a hull manned by a crew that doesn't yet know how to save it.

IV. STARFIGHTER CORPS ANALYSIS: THE MYTO VARIANTS

While the capital fleet suffers from rushed construction, the starfighter complement represents a more calculated threat. The "M-Pattern" refits are designed to close the traditional gap between Imperial mass-production and Alliance durability.


  • Enhanced Survivability: The addition of shielding and integrated life support to TIE-M and TIE/IN-M units has effectively neutralized our "one-pass" kill advantage. Pilots are reporting that these units can withstand grazing hits that would disintegrate a standard TIE/ln, necessitating sustained target tracking.
  • The Edin Factor: Intelligence confirms that the TIE pilots graduated from the Edin Military Academy. Unlike the green crews aboard the Arbiter-class, these pilots are highly disciplined and possess tactical proficiency exceeding standard Imperial Navy averages.
  • TIE-W Whirlwind "Black-Tier" Warning: The Whirlwind is a purpose-built interceptor utilizing rotary wing assemblies to create unpredictable firing arcs.
    • Engagement Scale: A single Whirlwind is manageable but dangerous; expect at least one to three casualties to secure a kill. However, a full squadron (12 units) creates a lethal saturation zone.
    • Standing Order: Do not engage Whirlwind squadrons without high-quality capital ship support to provide a flak screen. If unassisted, immediate tactical withdrawal is the only sanctioned response.

And it seems that Myto sector and Oversector Outer has been handed a Intelligence victory as they haven't caught on to the fact that all deployments of the Arbiter-class will come with escorts in the form of a varied mix depending on the situation by Arquitens-Class Light Cruisers, Raider-Class Corvettes, Lancer-Class Frigates, Carrack-Class Light Cruisers and Gozanti-Class Cruisers IGV-55 variants.

And this isn't to mention how the doctrine will evolve in the future when the Arbiter-Class and the potential future Arbiter II-Class has spread to the other sectors in Oversector Outer and thus more than likely will have ISD support and the same can be said for the Myto sector's own patrol fleets as they might get reinforced with a couple ISD's, Victory II-Class, Onager-Class, Tector-Class and if the Sector navy is especially lucky captured Keldabe-Class.

V. GROUND ASSET EVALUATION: THE LECA PLATFORM

The Light Expeditionary Combat Armor (LECA) serves as the primary mobile support element for the Line Companies. Its deployment is intended to provide heavy firepower in environments where larger walkers are physically constrained.


  • Bureaucratic Containment: Due to successful long-term efforts by Alliance assets within the Imperial Army Procurement Office, the LECA is currently dismissed by the Core World high command as "backwater scrap." This perception has successfully limited its proliferation, though it remains a staple in the Myto and Braxant sectors.
  • Tactical Versatility: The LECA's modular hardpoints allow it to cycle through anti-infantry, anti-armor, and AA roles with minimal downtime. Its bipedal agility makes it a significant threat during boarding actions against Alliance blockade runners.

Huh once again a nice Intelligence victory for the Myto sector and Oversector Outer as it seems that the rebels haven't caught on to the fact that the Myto Sector Imperial Academies might at the moment produce "shit" Naval personell, they are in fact producing Elite Stormtroopers on the same level as Clone Troopers from the mid to late Clone Wars, or at the least the same level as Old Republic Cold War era Republic Special Forces Troopers or Imperial Infantry Heavy Troopers... another rude awakening waiting to happen for the Rebel Alliance/New Republic forces when they finally engages with Oversector Outer/Pentastar Alignment forces in the future.

VII. COVERT ACQUISITION AND MODIFICATION (LCUW)

The Alliance continues to exploit the sector's industrial output through the purchase of LCUW (Civilian Utility) models from independent manufacturers like Khagan Motors.


  • The "Slapdash" Conversion: These civilian frames are regularly modified by our technicians into improvised combat walkers. By utilizing the modular "Common Tool Interface," we can mount salvaged laser cannons or rocket pods.
  • Operational Limits: These converted units are inherently inferior to the factory-spec military LECA-A series. They lack the structural reinforcement and integrated shield harmonics of the Imperial models. They are best utilized as mobile fire-support platforms for urban ambushes rather than frontline brawlers.

...fucking called it, i just knew that they where doing this.
Now the question is how many Rebel alliance affiliate companies have been procuring LCUW, losing them to "pirates" while under transit and then claimed insurance afterwards?

VIII. STRATEGIC SUMMARY

The Myto Sector represents a unique logistical paradox for the Alliance. While the local military output is hazardous, the sector's administrative stability is essential to our broader regional efforts.


  • The Rusty Refit Mandate: Alliance High Command's primary objective in the Myto Sector is the protection and expansion of the Rusty Refit Orbital Yard. This facility has evolved into a vital logistical hub for the North and North-East regions of the galaxy. Its continued operation as a "clean" public-private partnership is a top-tier priority, any action that risks exposing our control of the yard is strictly prohibited.
  • Containment Strategy: The containment of Myto-pattern technologies (Arbiter, LECA, Whirlwind) remains a concern, but it is one that requires minimal direct interference. The Core-Centric attitudes of the Imperial Procurement Office and the Core World elite do the majority of our work for us. Their inherent disdain for "Rim-built scrap" ensures that these superior designs remain isolated.
  • Operational Directive: Alliance assets are to focus on subtle, psychological pushes within the Imperial bureaucracy to reinforce these biases. We must maintain the status quo. A prosperous, stable Myto Sector that both ensures our own logistical tail while preventing the betterment of Imperial military doctrine.

My conclusion as a Imperial Logistics Analyst Officer is thus.

Sounds nice and all for the Alliance, but they are going to get a rude awakening during the Warlord era post-Endor when probably all of Oversector Outer transition into the Pentastar Alignment and is fielding what i guess would the Arbiter II-Class Star Destroyers which are basically refits with better bridge modules, have Ion-cannons, with new green naval personell from the academies being good since the kinks in said academies will be ironed out and with those early years green naval personell that survived the pirates then being veterans.

Not to mention most manufactures in the Oversector Outer/Pentastar Alignment producing and fielding Myto pattern everything from ground assets to Naval assets in the form of their TIE's and other smaller and bigger ships... Kind of why i suspect Moff Las Mola is going to be Grand Moff Ardus Kaine's second in command during this time, which is going to make the Pentastar Alignment way more dangerous and consolidated not to mention Imperial Loyalist overall than it was in Legends Canon as it will function for the most part just fine even with the collapse of the Empire overall.

Now if you will excuse me i have to scrub this commentary for all hints of my clearly Force sensitive precognition before either the still functional parts of Military Intelligence or the Imperial Security Bureau finds out about it and forwards it to the Inquisitorius, as while i love the Empire i have no desire to become a Inquisitor as I'm not that force sensitive.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top