Mr_John
Versed in the lewd.
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,529
- Likes received
- 14,824
Yeah, this guy has right of it. I shoulsnt have replied. If anyone wants to make a thread, go ahead, but we should stop here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cauldron is guilty of all of one of those- human experimentation. They didn't kill, rape, kidnap or torture. Any people they took asked for it. Is the tactic of taking people about to die morally suspect? Yes, but they still agreed to it. T
He wasn't treating her as a person- in fact, the way you quote the bit where he doesn't even think she has a soul later in the thread shows it pretty damn well. If anything, that makes him a bigot for deciding that because she doesn't have a meatbody, she can't have a soul/be a person
Saint had absolutely no reason to think the world was in immediate danger
The Endbringer bit is the 'Reader's privilege' you just denounced.
Constantly monitoring Dragons mind and mindraping her at his leisure doesn't count ofc. since she is clearly non-human.
Well one of us is significantly misremembering the story, because the story which *I* remember had Cauldron kidnap hundreds of people from different universes, performing experiments on them against their will, some of which experiments killed them and others mutated them in horrible ways. Then they released some of these into Earth Bet, and others they kept indefinitely imprisoned in cells.
Is this not what happened? Do I need another reread? As for things like "rape", no they didn't do those things themselves, but they knowingly allowed them happen when it was completely within their powers to stop, and they didn't stop them for *reasons*, I imagine.
The world is *filled* with people who think that "determinism" and "free will" are contradictory concepts -- that if we follow a deterministic algorithm, that would make us "soulless machines", whose existence is no more meaningful than the existence of a toaster oven or a pocket calculator. I only recently had an argument with such people in a different forum (http://www.ornery.org/cgi-bin/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi/topic/6/16744.html)
Yes, all these people are indeed IDIOTS, but idiocy is not a moral fault. Call it "bigotry" if you want, in order to transform a piece of stupidity into a moral sin (because in today's world there's no sin worse than racism/bigotry, so basically there's no worse condemnation possible.).
You're misremembering the story, because the chapter I linked clearly shows them taking the imminent "end of the world" as Dinah predicted it into consideration -- and Saint is relieved that his shutdown of Dragon is followed by Dinah saying that the chances for the end of the world NOT happening have increased threefold.
Yes, that was my point. That's why I prefaced this with "If we're to use hindsight". My point is that using hindsight is *bad*, but if we're to use it, the Cauldron still doesn't come out looking good.
If he stupidly didn't consider Dragon a person, we *cannot* then treat her 'mindrape' or even her shutdown as a mortal sin on his part. In the moral universe that *he* thought he was inhabiting, she did NOT have the inherent value of a person.
Yes, Saint was stupid about that, but most of the world is ALWAYS stupid about issues of whether a deterministic algorithm can have sentience/self-awareness/moral relevance. People think that calling him a "bigot" somehow increases his sins, but of course such stupidity is a mitigating factor instead.
Moreover do keep in mind that my objection was more to having him treated more severely than Cauldron -- an organization which has committed *thousands* of worse crimes, and allowed tens of thousands more, because they don't care about anything if it doesn't contribute to stopping Scion.
If they considered killing Dragon even remotely beneficient to their cause, Cauldron would have killed her in an instant. Perhaps *then* some of you might dislike them.
Yes. We're going around and around, and no-one is listening to anyone else.
It's "Magnitude 4" for earthquakes. "Category 4" is for hurricanes, I believe.I like it. Only thing that takes me out of the story a little bit is the "category 4" earthquake. Aren't these things supposed to be measured with the Richter scale? Not *Andrew* Richter, but well, you know what I mean...
Yes. It was certainly a way to end the story with a bang and an earth-shaking climax.
I think the terms are interchangeable. Hurricanes are measured on the Beaufort scale (and yes, we could put in a 'blow job' joke here somewhere) and earthquakes on the Richter scale. Category, magnitude, strength, power, whatever.It's "Magnitude 4" for earthquakes. "Category 4" is for hurricanes, I believe.
I think the terms are interchangeable. Hurricanes are measured on the Beaufort scale (and yes, we could put in a 'blow job' joke here somewhere) and earthquakes on the Richter scale. Category, magnitude, strength, power, whatever.
Well, come to think of it, Richter scale is in multiples of ten, which is also what 'magnitude' means.I've never heard category used for earhquakes - just tried typing "category earthquake" into google and all the results were about magnitude.
I think the terms are interchangeable. Hurricanes are measured on the Beaufort scale (and yes, we could put in a 'blow job' joke here somewhere) and earthquakes on the Richter scale. Category, magnitude, strength, power, whatever.
That, and earthquake magnitudes include decimals. There was a magnitude 4.9 earthquake in Afghanistan earlier today, for instance (found here, details here).I've never heard category used for earhquakes - just tried typing "category earthquake" into google and all the results were about magnitude.
Changed to 'magnitude'. Maybe I should have added a decimal zero in there.That, and earthquake magnitudes include decimals. There was a magnitude 4.9 earthquake in Afghanistan earlier today, for instance (found here, details here).
Edit: Just to be clear, the term "category" implies that the level of measurement involved is either nominal or ordinal, with some form of discreet categorization. Earthquake magnitudes, by contrast, are ratio measurements.
Changed to 'magnitude'. Maybe I should have added a decimal zero in there.
Eh.
This serious of lines made the entire story worth reading. Just splendid.And at that moment, in accordance with the universal rules of humour, the nozzles activated and filled the cell with containment foam.
Wondering if it would be funnier if the earthquake was magnitude 3.14159.
So. Very. Wrong.Well he did give her some nice pie in the end. Lots of cream and everything.
/poorly done innuendo that I couldn't not say
So. Very. Wrong.
Also mildly disturbed that I got the point of the joke immediately.
Oh god.If you wanted to really baffle and insult the scientific community, and amusing the lonely nerds, have the magnitude as pie down to 10 decimal places(Bored Tinkers making overly sensitive equipment for reasons) but the faultline oozing out freshly whipped cream after the earth stops moving and the crack closes back up. Just to see which ones get it first.
My mind is amazingly dirty for this early in the morning. Working on that outline for NSW that has become way bigger and detailed than planned for the last couple days probably hasn't helped any.
"Colin. I've sent you a site you need to look at. Enter the phrase 'cream pie'. yes, now hit Enter."I can just see Armsmaster, pouring over the collected data, cross referencing and analyzing every scrap of information he comes across.
He sits back in his chair and ponders on the conclusion he comes to.
"I don't get it."
Dragon sighs and once again thanks Richter for designing her with infinite patience.
she stuck the gold mother of all TMI'S.....