D'znn-Xy'lll MetaChthonia
⌈META⌋
- Joined
- May 3, 2017
- Messages
- 3,687
- Likes received
- 22,597
Huh? Didn't know I had this Watched.
Personally I think it is both. It's constructing just enough technology to make it seem technological but leaving out the important bits which the Shard simulates in as a Striker power which is why Tinkertech breaks down arbitrarily and is seemingly impossible to reproduce yet is just technological enough to convince people it isn't just a Striker power. Wildbow has also stated Shards take shortcuts. Albeit it was in reference to PTV when he said that. The Shards also do a LOT of simulating. There also is a Canon precedent in the form of that one guy from Chicago who could give the properties of various things by fusing them together, basically Tinkertech works off something halfway like that. The Shard could also steal some of the energy to maintain its own simulation if it generates more then is necessary like using two 9V batteries when it really needed a button battery. This also means the Shard can set arbitrary limits to what it can do and give aesthetics in complete defiance of how it should have worked. It might also create the design incorrectly so it actively relies on the Shard to keep from breaking (like using more voltage for a circuit then it could reasonably take and when the Shard gets bored the device explodes or two pieces being held apart by a magnet that somehow remains perfectly between them no matter what). Not only would that be fully technological but it would also be impossible to reproduce because a 1:1 reproduction would actually fail successfully.I mean, it's at least WoG and possibly canon that a Tinker can't accurately describe what is happening when they are Tinkering (and certainly it's implied by "no reproducing Tinkertech"). There are two ways that can make sense - altered cognition, and/or the Tinker's actions are irrelevant window dressing and the Shard is actually nanolathing that shit. Wildbow's WoG mentions both IIRC, although honestly I think he overestimates how far the first can actually take you in modern Earth.
(Reverse engineering is hard, but much easier than research. On the other hand, it doesn't matter if you can reverse-engineer something if building it requires tools you don't have.)
Last edited: