• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

What Makes a Pure Evil Villain?

Seth Vatamaris

Hentai Will Save the World
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
11,577
Bringing this from SB as there's not much traffic reaching

I was trying to think of how to make this thread then this video came out



It's a analysis of what makes a villain so pure irredeemably evil and its a hard topic to pin down. I once expressed annoyance at the Anti Villain which going by TvTropes has far more sub-categories than Anti Hero, and in my experience I've seen better Anti Villains than Anti Heroes. The problem I had was that everyone has to be so complicated ranging from "why aren't you a hero already?" to "why are you refuse to take a few closer to being totally evil?"

This thread is about those who either somersault across the line or just like to poke it. And believe me there are far more in the latter.

Usually the surefire way to make a Complete Monster memorable is having such a long and closely defining conflict with the protagonist, hurting them personally in any way possible, and tearing at the soul of the heroes. Winning is optional.


But like any trope or character type they can be written badly if you don't have a good understanding of them. And yes there are many categories of villains and just because they aren't a monster doesn't mean they're a "normal" villain. Even the so called regular ones can do some pretty horrible things but context is dependant on the story, what might be horrible in one is normal in another. And I've been surprised when someone gets listed as Pure Evil that I never really considered unless I took at good look at their laundry list of crimes.





The video here claims that backstory doesn't matter to them, The Joker being the prime example, but Scourge a fan favorite from Warrior Cats has a backstory and it didn't detract from his villainy.

Then there were those who had complex motivations in the past but became evil like Megatron from Transformers Prime, Griffith from Berserk (points for changing in story), Abaddon from 40k to a degree.

Of course what is hated is when villains who were previously monsters are forcibly made sympathetic or have their crimes swept under the rug. Mayuri Kurotsuchi from BLEACH was introduced turing his men into bombs "Bombs aren't meant to come back" torture his clone daughter and brag about his part in the Quincy Genocide while rubbing in how he experimented on and tortured Uryuu's grandfather while showing him a picture. Then Kubo turns him into walking example of black comedy and the "necessary evil" of the Soul Society while having him fight Sazyel who is even worse than him.

Orochimaru from Naruto is a stanger case as his original form is tapped for all eternity and his current form is an old backup that's had lots of time to think about his mistakes.

Sir Crocodile from One Piece was easily a monster in his first appearance for engineering a civil war in Alabasta for starters, then he got more complicated when he returned in Impel Down years later.

Eobard Thawne aka the Reverse Flash from The Flash (2014-present) or at least well with Time Remnants its complicated but much like his comic counterpart he tried to kill a young Barry Allen; he failed so he killed his mother and framed his father. Throughout the first season he kills people who threaten Barry or try to out is identity, kills Cisco who he considers a son in one timeline, killed and replaced Harrison Wells, and when his plan to return home failed he tried to kill Barry and everyone he cares about out of spite.

In Season 2 in his Harrison Wells disguise he confesses to murdering Barry's mother on a video that he left behind in case he died, true Harrison Wells of Earth-1 will be remembered as a murderer. He gets more complicated in his other appearances but is still evil and wants to hurt Barry in some way, one version of him kills and replaces Wells for kicks and joins the Nazis of Earth-X. in Season 5 he cares about Nora West-Allen like a daughter.
 
Unlike an anti-villain, what makes a truly vile villain great and memorable has nothing to do with their ethos or the morality of their actions. You can piss people off by trying to turn such a true villain into an antihero, but simply having them stay villainous is not enough to be great.

No, they're great when they have style. Xykon from Order of the Stick has an unearthly Charisma score, and acts like it. The sixth Master from Doctor Who steals every goddamned scene with his great (if usually fatal) sense of humour and his total and obvious disdain for anything resembling decorum. And so on.
 
Evil is a religious term. People don't get sent to jail for being evil. Only for committing crimes.

So, for a villain to be evil it will need to be a religious context.
 
Unlike an anti-villain, what makes a truly vile villain great and memorable has nothing to do with their ethos or the morality of their actions. You can piss people off by trying to turn such a true villain into an antihero, but simply having them stay villainous is not enough to be great.

No, they're great when they have style. Xykon from Order of the Stick has an unearthly Charisma score, and acts like it. The sixth Master from Doctor Who steals every goddamned scene with his great (if usually fatal) sense of humour and his total and obvious disdain for anything resembling decorum. And so on.
Doflamingo from One Piece.
Jack Slash from Worm.
 
A truly evil villain is one who commits evil without reason. Even the joker and jack slash have the reason of entertainment. A truly pure evil villain wouldn't torture and kill a man out of boredom or for fun. They'd do it just because he was there. Evil is there good.
 
Irrideamable evil is when their plan doesn't even result in anything worthwhile. Not even petty gain for themselves.

Thanos is irredeemable because he's so stupid.
His homeworld underwent a resource crisis, so he assumed that every single planet in all of reality was exactly the same, and what he saw was inevitable?
Dumb

But his solution is to get his hands on the incredibly powerful reality-altering rocks so that he can fix the world.
Alright, his premise is flawed but his solution may have merit. With this he could totally erase all resource problems across all of reality.

'I'm going to kill half of every living creature (including livestock)'
That's moronic, and hidiously immoral, and a complete waste of such an incredibly powerful tool.
'Then after doing that once, I'm going to destroy the tools I used to do it, so that when we're facing the same (nonexistant) problem in 1 or 2 generations, there will be no way to fix it'

His entire thought process is completely without merit, and involves becoming the greatest mass-murderer ever, for absolutely no gain to anyone. Least of all himself.

Totally beyond redemption. At least his comicbook counterpart was just a selfish horny cunt. It was humanising.
 
Last edited:
His entire thought process is completely without merit, and involves becoming the greatest mass-murderer ever, for absolutely no gain to anyone. List of all himself.

Totally beyond redemption. At least his comicbook counterpart was just a selfish horny cunt. It was humanising.

Actually, he states that his shit worked, at least on Gamorrahs homeplanet, and nobody ever says that this is bullshit.

Of course that is ridiculous, but it just shows that in-universe is right because he lives in a universe that runs on nonsense-logic.
 
Actually, he states that his shit worked, at least on Gamorrahs homeplanet, and nobody ever says that this is bullshit.

Of course that is ridiculous, but it just shows that in-universe is right because he lives in a universe that runs on nonsense-logic.

Sure, he says that, but...

76lbb.jpg


He's fuckin lying, ain't he?
 
Last edited:
So wait, does that mean Thanos hallucinates all the time?

At the risk of treading rule 8, think of Thanos like those [insert religion here] fanatic nutters who give the entire faith a bad name, via doing stupid and violent shit, and not realizing they're the baddies. He's not stupid, just crazy; the difference being his logic is completely bonkers, and he's blind/deaf to anything that threatens his worldview.

In his own mind, he's the hero trying to save the universe.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top