I was asked to rant about it, so I will. I'm not one for numeric scores, I saw the movie and didn't like it, and probably wouldn't recommend it to others (though most of the people who care about my opinion have already sceen it). I've got a lot to unpack about it, so I'll divide it up into sections.
Stuff I Didn't Like, but I Can Forgive
The way this movie really poops on the the
'Happy Ending' of Return of the Jedi.
In fact, it makes the very title of that movie a lie. The Jedi didn't "Return" at all as is it turns out. (Some of this is also from TFA)
- Luke fails to restore the Jedi Order. All his students are either dead or turned to the dark-side.
- Leia fails to restore the Republic, in fact she sees it litteraly blown apart before her eyes.
- Han and Leia's relationship falls apart. He is murdered by his own son.
And now in this movie, it is revealed that the reason all this shit happened, is that Luke Skywalker, the man who found the good in his father, the most evil man in the galaxy (or #2) and a child murderer. Had a 'fleeting thought' where he thought the best course of action was to
muder the teenage son of his best friend, his nephew, in his sleep. What kind of psychopath thinks these things! 'Not my Luke' The movie tells us that he senses darkness in him (and plays some noises). But some
serious show not tell was needed here if you want me to buy into this plot line. Afterwards he follows the example of Yoda and Ben and goes into hiding.
Buuuuuut I can forgive this. It's a different story and they need to move the old characters out of the way somehow. I don't like it. But I can understand and overlook it.
The way this movie throws out a lot of the seeds TFA planted
So the Force Awakens planted a lot of seeds. Who is Snoke? The nights of Ren. The mystery of Rei's origins. Then this movie pretty much throws them out. Snoke's backstory... not explained. The Knights of Ren? = Sir not appearing in this film. Rei's origins = she's a nobody.
Honestly, I am actually
mostly okay with this. I didn't particularly like The Force Awakens, so I didn't really have a lot invested in its plot points. Buuuut it would have been nice to have some acknowledgement of them.
Luke's Death
I thought it was a stupid and anti-heroic way for him to go out. But well I guess they got to get him out somehow. (I'm also pissed at
Minion #Q for expousing my "what if Luke was dead the whole time theory before I could get to it!)
Stuff I thought was Stupid
The movie had a lot of moments that I thought were just well stupid, or put more politely, "in elegantly handled."
The movies constant need to subvert the narrative, to the point where somethings stop making sense.
Honestly, this was a big one for me, and I guess this is a point on which opinions can honestly differ, but I hold to this strongly. Fundamentally I believe Star Wars (or at least a 'main line' Star Wars movie) is not a narrative that needs to be/should be subverted. Star Wars (to me) isn't a film about nuance or some kind of reflection of reality. It is, essentially, a Fantasy Story. Good and Evil. Black and White. Big picture heroics and stuff. It's not that I'm against subverting narratives, far from it, but I don't think it needs to happen in
Star Wars.
But the movie is big on this, and specifically on subverting the Star Wars heroic narritive. Poe isn't a hero when he blows up the dreadnaught, he is a hot-shot who just got a lot of people killed. Fin's and Rose's million to one plan to take down the tracking thing fails because such plans normally would. And referencing the above, Luke isn't a hero (anymore?) he's a hermit coward. Even the first order isn't really and evil empire, they are led by a bunch of baffons and blow hards. Yes, obviously all those things happen in real life, but again, Star Wars isn't/shouldn't be a movie about 'real life' it's a movie about Big Picture heroics. When our hero's fail, it should be due to epic, big reasons.
(Credit where credit is due, I thought Snokes death was the one point where the subversion worked, probably because he failed for a big epic reason... epic arrogance).
It also can't even keep its subverting straight. Rose tells Fin he shouldn't sacrifice himself for his friends... just a couple scenes after purple hair just did the exact same thing! Plus... like maybe I missed it, but they didn't seem to have any guns on those speeders, so I'm not sure what other plan they had besides ramming to take out death-laser-gun.
The Movies Theme is not well handled.
Obviously a big theme of this movie was "people learn best from failure" but it's pretty ham-handed and inelligent on shoving this down our throat. But honestly, I think the whole idea of a character "learning" is missing a point in a Fantasy movie like this. When a character grows or develops in a Fantasy Movie, its not about "learning" it's about
discovery. The difference is that learning implies that the character decides that some old aspect of their character was wrong and is refuted. Where as discover is just the character being revealed to have another aspect of their character. Han Solo doesn't
learn to trust in others, that was always in him, he just discovered or decided to bring it to the front. Darth Vader didn't just like finally found out "oh shit, evil is evil!" he always had good in him, it is just brought out. In other words, in an 'Epic Movie' character growth isn't about the character
changing it's about the character
developing.
But more then that, as I said before, failures should be for
Epic reasons. When Luke fails in Empire (he gest his ass kicked and his hand cut off), it's because of an Epic character trait of his, he isn't willing to let his friends die. But this trait isn't refuted in the movie, it's reinforced (Luke goes back to save Han in the next film!). When Han fails in Empire it's because a friend he trusted betrays him. But again, this trait isn't refuted, it's reinforced in the film, as Han's other new friend risks his life to save him. And of course the other Epic reason they fail is because the Empire is an Epic villan. Vast and powerful. The failures in this film are all (IMO) due to character traits that are being refuted/subverted in this film. "Don't be a hero" (Fin), "Follow Orders" (Poe), "Million to one plans are stupid." And never because of the active actions of the villans. Which brings me to reason 3 I hated.
The First Order are Idiots
To have Epic Heros, you need Epic Villans. But the First Order isn't Epic, unless you mean Epicly stupid. The movie goes out of its way to poop on them and how stupid they are in ways both explicit (like the opening scene) and implicit (they have this big ass fleet and can't chase down one ship). And yeah, it's fun to make fun of the bad guys. But here is the thing, if you make all your opponents into morons, then there is no triumph in beating them. Who takes joy in beatting a buffon? Hux is explicitly worthless. Is anyone going to really feel triumph when he gets his comeuppance? No, he'll still have killed countless billions and you'll be the one to blame for not stopping such a moron easier.
In particular, the Supremecy or whatever annoyed me as well. It's just pointlessly big, just to characterise as the First Order as a bunch of dumbies with big toys and no brains. Every single aspect of the (stupid) chase scene could have been accomplished without the stupid supership. It didn't raise the stakes, it just made everything seem dumber to me.
The Whole Chase and Casino Planet Plot
Much e-ink has already been spilt on how these don't work. I'll just say I agree with most of them.
To much 'stuff'
Star Wars again is a movie about big ideas and things. But this movie is far to much about speicifc numbers and tactics and technobable and nonsense. We should never care about how much fuel is left in a ship. Or how many fighters or bombers the fleet has. Or ship speeds or whatever. This is all just 'stuff.' Star Wars shouldn't be a film about stuff, it should be a film about ideas. As a rule of thumb if you need to go over a sentance in explaining how some tech plays into some plot point? You've made a mistake.
An unfortunate side effect of this focus on stuff, is that when you have a big 'idea moment' like when puple hair rams the super-ship, now everyone is going to be wondering about the 'stuff' of it. Like 'why didn't they do that earlier.'
Things I hated
The Silliness
I'm not against humor, far from it. I'm not against sillyness either. But there is a time and a place. And this film far to commonly used sillyness out of place in a way that both took me out of the movie (because the sillyness was so obviously artifical and there for a laugh) and because it often was ill timed. A key example of this is when Po insults Hux at the beginning of the film. Not only is this undercutting the legitmacy of a character you should be building up. It also saps the tension out of what should be a very tense scene. The resistance's last base is about to be blowed up! Well then... time for a Joke! gah. No.
Space Flight Leia
My bro put it this way. "It is as if, Disney littearly reanimated her couprse and had her fly back into the movie." (Probably kept in just to... you guessed it, subvert our expectations again). I guess not even in Death can you escape the mouse.
Dismissive use of dialog
Yes. Hyperspace and Lighsabers are silly things in reality, but this film isn't reality, it's Star Wars. Calling them laser swords (repeatedly) and light speed (repatedly) seems insulting to the setting.
Things I Liked
I did like the whole Rei-Ren plot line, and the death of Snoke.
I liked that it covered the same ground as Empire, without hitting the exact same beats.
Some of the cinematography (hyperspace ram), Salt-Flat planet, was on point.