• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Coronavirus COVID-19 Pandemic

So, turns out Italy's been cooking the books on kung flu death numbers. They have been, amongst other things, counting every death suffered by someone with the virus as due to it, even when it's caused by other stuff (such as car accidents).
 
EDIT: Nope - TA

I am also going to post this. To misquote the article's title slightly, I will take evidence over idiotic hysteria any day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Huh, that's neat.

Still going to avoid it like the plague because it's highly likely I would be fucked royally if I ever got the virus due to my health history. Or because of my health history of constantly fighting lung virus's, severe bronchitis, pneumonia, the flu and the dreaded common cold I may be immune. I doubt that but that's just a humorous thought I had a bit after I heard this virus had confirmed cases in my county.
 
Not. A. Flu.

And, yet again, it's not a flu.

It doesn't even fucking resemble a flu from a medical standpoint, being about as far away from one as the cold is.
It's a member of the Corona-virus family, even if it's a much nastier version than has been seen before. I'm not calling it The Wuhan Flu to minimize it at all, I'm doing so because it's an accurate descriptor.

It's the same reason we call the Spanish Flu by its name. It was nastier than the normal, but still part of the same family.
 
As a reminder.

As always... stay on topic, don't go into current politics, no snipping... try to stay insult free... you know the drill.

EDIT
Things like this are on topic:
  • The current spread of the disease, where it's infecting and case numbers.
  • Personal impact of the disease on members, who here has it what is happening with those not infected in the attempts to control it.
  • Resources for information and how to avoid, detect, and treat it.
  • Current news on the measures being put into place to stop the spread or help those impacted, opinions should avoid tying things to too closely to Rule 8 since it may involve things like immigration.
  • What members should do in the meantime, such as suggestions for good supplies or methods to kill time if they are under quarantine, as well as any support for those of use afflicted.
Snipping at each other? isn't.

Also, language is a thing... so, deciding to call it "kung flu" isn't funny, so don't... ditto with things like "chinese flu"...
 
It's a member of the Corona-virus family, even if it's a much nastier version than has been seen before. I'm not calling it The Wuhan Flu to minimize it at all, I'm doing so because it's an accurate descriptor.

It's the same reason we call the Spanish Flu by its name. It was nastier than the normal, but still part of the same family.
Except it isn't a flu, so accuracy isn't a defense. The Spanish Flu was a flu -- it was caused by a strain of H1N1 influenza. Caronaviruses aren't, as I noted, even in the same phylum. They're around as related to influenza as elephants and sea cucumbers are.

There's little symptom overlap, either, except in very mild cases.

And as for Angry Puffball's link and commentary... I'm just going to facepalm.
 
Well, on a tangental note to the doom, anyone else going slowly mad from excessive family togetherness?

I'm stuck in here with two toddlers and the aforementioned sick wife, who, checking off most of the criteria for suddenly dieing from this thing has decided to spend her time engineering more complicated garden solutions to be fit into our little yard, and she's insisting on taking all the space between toddler storms getting my input in detail or discussing alternative school options for my tiny chaotic friends.

Well, that or politics.

All three of them require some degree of affability and presence from me, or they really start to freak out, so hiding out or going through the home repair backlog is somehow also impossible.

Oh! And its allergy season, so I can either sneeze constantly and convince her that I've caught the plague, or take Benadryl and convince her that I've caught the plague!
 
Last edited:
Well, on a tangental note to the doom, anyone else going slowly mad from excessive family togetherness?

I'm stuck in here with two toddlers and the aforementioned sick wife, who, checking off most of the criteria for suddenly dieing from this thing has decided to spend her time engineering more complicated garden solutions to be fit into our little yard, and she's insisting on taking all the space between toddler storms getting my input in detail or discussing alternative school options for my tiny chaotic friends.

Well, that or politics.

All three of them require some degree of affability and pressence from me, or they real start to freak out, so hiding out or going through the home repair backlog is somehow also impossible.

Oh! And its allergy season, so I can either sneeze constantly and convince her that I've caught the plague, or take Benadryl and convince her that I've caught the plague!
I'll admit that I'm not an expert regarding the Corona virus but if I recall correctly sniffling and sneezing are not symptoms of the disease.
 
so is there any legoble information and research into what corona virus is susceptible to? 'cause I don't beleive that bullshit about hot climates and gurgling hot water in your mouth...
 
so is there any legoble information and research into what corona virus is susceptible to?
What do you mean by "susceptible to?"- because it's susceptible to a lot of things, up to and including good ol' soap and water. It's not a particularly resilient disease, even by the fragile standard of the virus... it dies to all sorts of things when out of the body. Including extreme heat, extreme cold, salt, ph imbalance, dehydration (re: dry climates) and even oxygen if you give it time. Nine days is the upper extreme of this family's surface survival in perfect conditions, though I'd give it a full two weeks to be on the safe side.

https://www.medicaldaily.com/new-study-reveals-how-long-coronavirus-can-survive-surfaces-449484

But in the case of this particular virus, the overwhelming majority of infections are human to human air transmission. The viral particles are carried out of the lungs while breathing, float around a bit (no more than a minute- this is not an aerosol virus- but every breath of air from an infected person resets the clock) and either settle on the skin, eyes, or in the lungs of the next victim. It can probably also spread via tainted blood transfusion (unlikely it ever has, but it probably can), but that and surface vectors are exceedingly minor vectors of this family.

Once in the body... well, then you're pretty much fucked. And it is ever-so-good at finding ways into the body. Eyes, lungs, any scrape, cut, or sore on the skin, all make you vulnerable. Which basically means you need the full hazmat kit to be completely safe... though standard clothes will probably be enough, if they're full body coverage.

I don't beleive that bullshit about hot climates and gurgling hot water in your mouth.
Hot climates *do* appear to slow it down, as they slow other variants of the same family (like the common cold). So far, the spread pattern follows models built for diseases that favor cool weather (which again lines up with its common cold cousin). Not that it has much impact on a disease with this long an asymptomatic infectious period.

Gurgling hot water won't do shit, however.

See... there's very little reason to believe you can catch Wuhan flu or, really, the vast majority of viruses by swallowing them- the stomach is literally a churning toxin pump that destroys the vast majority of living tissue that enters it. There are things built to survive the experience, but most of them are bacteria, fungi, or macro-parasites. Viruses don't tend to do that... they have no reason to.

As mentioned before, viruses usually get in through the lungs, the eyes, and various possible abrasions of the skin. Which are much easier targets than through the mouth, since most people constantly use their skin, eyes, and lungs... but only literal mouth-breathers have their mouths open all the time.

If you have cuts in your mouth (or diseased gums), it could get in that way, but simply gargling with hot water won't help that much, if at all. That said, gargling hot water does help with the whole 'dental hygiene' thing, so it has other benefits.

Overall, however... the only guaranteed defense is to never breathe the same air as an infected person. Thus the whole 'social distancing' thing.
 
What do you mean by "susceptible to?"- because it's susceptible to a lot of things, up to and including good ol' soap and water. It's not a particularly resilient disease, even by the fragile standard of the virus... it dies to all sorts of things when out of the body. Including extreme heat, extreme cold, salt, ph imbalance, dehydration (re: dry climates) and even oxygen if you give it time. Nine days is the upper extreme of this family's surface survival in perfect conditions, though I'd give it a full two weeks to be on the safe side.

https://www.medicaldaily.com/new-study-reveals-how-long-coronavirus-can-survive-surfaces-449484

But in the case of this particular virus, the overwhelming majority of infections are human to human air transmission. The viral particles are carried out of the lungs while breathing, float around a bit (no more than a minute- this is not an aerosol virus- but every breath of air from an infected person resets the clock) and either settle on the skin, eyes, or in the lungs of the next victim. It can probably also spread via tainted blood transfusion (unlikely it ever has, but it probably can), but that and surface vectors are exceedingly minor vectors of this family.

Once in the body... well, then you're pretty much fucked. And it is ever-so-good at finding ways into the body. Eyes, lungs, any scrape, cut, or sore on the skin, all make you vulnerable. Which basically means you need the full hazmat kit to be completely safe... though standard clothes will probably be enough, if they're full body coverage.

Hot climates *do* appear to slow it down, as they slow other variants of the same family (like the common cold). So far, the spread pattern follows models built for diseases that favor cool weather (which again lines up with its common cold cousin). Not that it has much impact on a disease with this long an asymptomatic infectious period.

Gurgling hot water won't do shit, however.

See... there's very little reason to believe you can catch Wuhan flu or, really, the vast majority of viruses by swallowing them- the stomach is literally a churning toxin pump that destroys the vast majority of living tissue that enters it. There are things built to survive the experience, but most of them are bacteria, fungi, or macro-parasites. Viruses don't tend to do that... they have no reason to.

As mentioned before, viruses usually get in through the lungs, the eyes, and various possible abrasions of the skin. Which are much easier targets than through the mouth, since most people constantly use their skin, eyes, and lungs... but only literal mouth-breathers have their mouths open all the time.

If you have cuts in your mouth (or diseased gums), it could get in that way, but simply gargling with hot water won't help that much, if at all. That said, gargling hot water does help with the whole 'dental hygiene' thing, so it has other benefits.

Overall, however... the only guaranteed defense is to never breathe the same air as an infected person. Thus the whole 'social distancing' thing.
Thank you so much man!! This helps a lot!!
 
Hot climates *do* appear to slow it down, as they slow other variants of the same family (like the common cold).
Colds are generally rhinoviruses. They are, at least, more closely related than influenza is, being in the same phylum, but they aren't in the same order. To continue the analogy I used above about the flu, rhinoviruses are about as closely related to coronaviruses as elephants are to lancelets.

See... there's very little reason to believe you can catch Wuhan flu or, really, the vast majority of viruses by swallowing them-
Again. Not. A. Flu. This is coming only a couple of posts below Biigoh issuing a reminder about that rule, too.
 
Fuck, it's like I stepped back into SV's word-policing and political agendas.

Which one of the site's rules does calling Tom Riddle "The Dark Lord" instead of Voldemort break again?
Especially in Rants, where those rules are relaxed?


Everyone knows who you mean when you say "The Dark Lord" or when you say "Voldemort."
It's trying to police what people call him that's off-topic, basically a way to be uncivil, violating Rule 1, for what is likely a political purpose, violating Rule 8.
This after the promises made in the introduction of the site rules that this wouldn't be a site where that shit is pulled.
The subject under discussion was not made unclear by the use of a common vernacular instead of the official medical terminology.
The only people doing a derail are those trying to say otherwise instead of just going on talking about the damn virus and its pandemic.

This is my "bruh" voice, for when a mod action makes me say, "Bruh."
 
Last edited:
It is a flu. What it is not, is influenza.

This was covered earlier, and has been explained to you more than once... apparently you weren't paying attention.
No; you just ignored my -- rather unsubtle -- answers:
Except it isn't a flu, so accuracy isn't a defense. The Spanish Flu was a flu -- it was caused by a strain of H1N1 influenza. Caronaviruses aren't, as I noted, even in the same phylum. They're around as related to influenza as elephants and sea cucumbers are.

There's little symptom overlap, either, except in very mild cases.
Emphasis added. Or, well, this:
No. That might be vaguely acceptable if it was just a matter of terminology, or if the disease had been contained. As-is, when people not taking this seriously is a serious driving factor beyond the spread of what's basically a biblical plague, there are serious, moral problems with trivializing it.

Calling it a flu isn't just wrong in the ontological or factual sense -- the way in which calling a whale a fish would be. It's wrong in the moral sense -- in the same way in which breaking into my uncle's home and shooting him in the face would be, if not quite as blatantly so.

The outcome could very well be the same.
In other words, no, I have been paying attention. My position on this matter is both clear and unsubtle.
 
Fuck, it's like I stepped back into SV's word-policing and political agendas.

Which one of the site's rules does calling Tom Riddle "The Dark Lord" instead of Voldemort break again?
Especially in Rants, where those rules are relaxed?


Everyone knows who you mean when you say "The Dark Lord" or when you say "Voldemort."
It's trying to police what people call him that's off-topic, basically a way to be uncivil, violating Rule 1, for what is likely a political purpose, violating Rule 8.
This after the promises made in the introduction of the site rules that this wouldn't be a site where that shit is pulled.
The subject under discussion was not made unclear by the use of a common vernacular instead of the official medical terminology.
The only people doing a derail are those trying to say otherwise instead of just going on talking about the damn virus and its pandemic.

This is my "bruh" voice, for when a mod action makes me say, "Bruh."
For a second I thought I was in the SV rants with a situation in a HP thread that got really wacky mod attention, but I got it halfway through.
 
Fuck, it's like I stepped back into SV's word-policing and political agendas.

Which one of the site's rules does calling Tom Riddle "The Dark Lord" instead of Voldemort break again?
Especially in Rants, where those rules are relaxed?


Everyone knows who you mean when you say "The Dark Lord" or when you say "Voldemort."
It's trying to police what people call him that's off-topic, basically a way to be uncivil, violating Rule 1, for what is likely a political purpose, violating Rule 8.
This after the promises made in the introduction of the site rules that this wouldn't be a site where that shit is pulled.
The subject under discussion was not made unclear by the use of a common vernacular instead of the official medical terminology.
The only people doing a derail are those trying to say otherwise instead of just going on talking about the damn virus and its pandemic.

This is my "bruh" voice, for when a mod action makes me say, "Bruh."
You are right.

Let's use the-virus-that-must-not-be-named.
 
inform.png
Thank you for your effort. I want you to know I appreciate all the work you've done, data you've collected, research you've hunted down, and laying it all out.
 
Pretty sure that's just for stuff like kung flu" & "chinese flu" and so on.

Biigoh are we allowed to refer to the the Coronavirus as just the "flu"?

You could refer to it as a flu even if I feel it's inaccurate and likely to draw people's ire about it and generate the "someone is wrong on the internet" reaction.
 
Johnny Carson Jokes About The "Recent" Toilet Paper Shortage



Johnny Carson jokes about the recent toilet paper shortage. There was actually not a toilet paper shortage, but after Johnny delivered this joke people ran out to the stores to stock up! - Air date - 12/19/1973

In 1973 the OPEC gasoline crisis was in full swing, with gas lines an hour long just to buy 10 gallons. Johnny often used his monologue to lighten the nations mood. This time it backfired. within 24 hours the stores were empty. He had to go on the air to say "it was a joke."

We say now, if it's on the internet it must be true. During the 1970s if Johnny said it, it was true.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top