• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Eliminate the [abbr] Tag

The [abbr] tag?

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .

macdjord

Well worn.
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
9,047
Likes received
38,893
I propose and request that the [abbr] tag be disabled forthwith. I have never once seen it used for its intended purpose (expanding abbreviations and defining terms); instead people use it as a sort of parenthetical hidden text thing, at which purpose it is awkward and irritating.
 
Last edited:
macdjord said:
I propose and request that the [abbr] tag be disabled forthwith. I have never once seen it used for its intended purpose (abbreviations); instead people use it as a sort of parenthetical hidden text thing, at which purpose it is awkward and irritating.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
As a general rule, unless a forum feature is actively detrimental to the community at large -versus just annoying one person - they will not be disabled or removed.
 
I in have seen it used properly, so. .banNing a feature because it can be used in a way some people find mildly annoying s seems silly. If people are using it to be annoying, complain at those people. If they don't change..stop reading them?
 
Without intent to make a binding statement of policy, it is unlikely that we will remove a feature unless it's being actively detrimental. A markup tag which can be used in an irritating fashion doesn't really qualify.

If you come across it often and are annoyed by it, it's probably possible to write or find a user style or script which makes it more obvious, or shows the hidden text in parentheses, or something.
 
macdjord said:
*prods Valette-Serafina, whom he knows also dislike the [abbr]-as-hidden-text practice
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
... Um, I use abbr. Kinda often, actually.
For conversational tangents, mostly, though I may use it in text sometime. I use color=transparent too.
I actually kinda like it as a hidden text option. It's more noticeable than color=transparent is unless a marker is used.

I fully oppose any removal of features from the board. I like having the magic of bbcode at my fingertips.
 
Since I had it sitting around already, here's three different ways to make abbr more obvious for those you of that might want it. Just remove the /* */ from around whichever you want to use.

blockquote.messageText abbr, .message .signature abbr{
/*border-bottom-width:2px!important;*/ /*Makes the dots larger*/
/*border-bottom-color: red!important;*/ /*Changes the current version to a red line instead*/
/*border: 1px solid red!important;*/ /*Makes it a full red box instead.*/}
 
Plotvitalnpc said:
I don't dislike the practice, I just don't like when people use it in such a way that it's not at all obvious.
Like with text that's underlined.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
That's a reasonable argument for tweaking the site's CSS, though. Something like
CSS: 
u abbr, abbr u { text-decoration-style: wavy; }
or what-have-you.
 
macdjord said:
If you like a post which says X, you have no business complaining when people assume you support X~
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I wasn't complaining, I was genuinely curious about when I had expressed dislike toward the tag. Thank you for showing me that, though. In any case, it's not too big of an issue, just a slight annoyance that I can put up with.
 
macdjord said:
If you like a post which says X, you have no business complaining when people assume you support X~
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I will break the arrow off of the astrological sign which provides the only indication available to me about any trait of you as a person, you internet person with a handle I don't know how to pronounce.
My likes are symbols of a shared loss felt by everyone, and of the bonds of kinship that connect...well, if not everyone on QQ, everyone who was active in Valette's quests in times of yore.

I've liked a lot of things that I have no idea what they are, and a lot of things I'd probably disagree with.
About half of my likes are meaningless.

...anyways, that's enough of that.
Regardless, I cannot support your statement. That way lies having Likes default to Votes.
 
Oooh forgot about that feature; sounds mightily useful.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top