General chat thread

[MadGreenSon]

If you can afford it... garlic & onions, honey + ibuprofen. Should help you out if you try out a dollar store or budget friendly equivalent.

Click to shrink...

That's actually pretty similar to remedies I've used in the past.

Also, I kinda seriously want to go to your house the next time you slow roast some walrus because that sounds really good

—————————
Contributions to my medicine/gas/food needs welcome here

 

[BlackDragon98]

Bro, I can't even afford a full tank of gas, how can I get all that?


In other news, I just coughed up an amazing amount of phlegm after waking up to someone staring at me through my car's window. Goddamn do I miss privacy.




—————————
Contributions to my medicine/gas/food needs welcome here

Click to shrink...

Hmmmm . . . Have you tried looking at this site (assuming you're still in Florida)?
You worked, you paid taxes, now its time to get your tax return.

Most walruses can get as big as a polar bear. While walruses seem like an easy meal to younger polar bears, most older ones don't bother with em from what I've heard. Yeah... those tusks can kill and their fat blubber acts like a natural armor which makes polar bears sometimes struggle with biting into them.

Click to shrink...

Interesting.

From the few times I've had it over the past years: a leaner, gamey veal/beef with hints of fishiness.
Actually exquisite if you slow roast it with a dutch oven.

Click to shrink...

Alright, I'm putting walrus meat on my bucket list now.

We have trout. And they get record size big too. There's pike - actually there's a lake that's famous in my tribe for producing crazy huge pike, like several feet long at least.

Click to shrink...

What species of trout?

Do you eat the pike? I've had them and they're fairly bony so I prefer walleye or rainbows instead.

And the sturgeon? God, don't even get me started on them.

Click to shrink...

Aren't sturgeon strictly catch and release because they're endangered?

 

[MadGreenSon]

Alright, I'm putting walrus meat on my bucket list now.

Click to shrink...

You ain't kidding.


Anyone want to hear some heartwarming shit? Check this out;

There I was kinda slumped at a picnic table getting some air and nursing my cough while messing with my phone and one of the people who were picnicking on the other side of the rest area comes over with a sturdy paper plate heaving with food and says"You look like you're having a rough time of it, this'll make you feel better, guaranteed,"

The plate was loaded with boneless pork chops, mashed potatoes, Mac and cheese, and turnip greens.
Y'know what? I was both touched and I do feel better.

If anyone tells you I cried a bit into my plate of soul food from the kindness of the act… they're right, it was also fucking delicious.

—————————
Contributions to my medicine/gas/food needs welcome here

 

[Scygnus]

Maybe someone can help me solve this problem, because it's driving me insane.

So I have a list of 192 items, named and numbered, from 1 to 204. 116-120 and 123-130 are missing, should be 12 missing in total, giving 192.

I have these items divided into groups of 16, which 192 perfectly divides into 12 groups. All in order. The first and last number of each group is correct.

The problem: I just found 116 in the group it should be in, the one with all the gaps... Which means another one should be missing, since the division is perfect. Since 193 doesn't divide into 16.

But the rest of the numbers all line up still. All the groups have the correct amount, the right start and end numbers, and all the items, both on the list and actual, definitely exist.

The only thing I haven't done is go through each individual item in each individual group, but the start and end numbers should be different if that's wrong - I'll do that in a bit but I don't expect it to work.

Anyone have a clue where my missing item went? There's no 0 item, before you ask.

 

[Hyp3rB14d3]

Maybe someone can help me solve this problem, because it's driving me insane.

So I have a list of 192 items, named and numbered, from 1 to 204. 116-120 and 123-130 are missing, should be 12 missing in total, giving 192.

I have these items divided into groups of 16, which 192 perfectly divides into 12 groups. All in order. The first and last number of each group is correct.

The problem: I just found 116 in the group it should be in, the one with all the gaps... Which means another one should be missing, since the division is perfect. Since 193 doesn't divide into 16.

But the rest of the numbers all line up still. All the groups have the correct amount, the right start and end numbers, and all the items, both on the list and actual, definitely exist.

The only thing I haven't done is go through each individual item in each individual group, but the start and end numbers should be different if that's wrong - I'll do that in a bit but I don't expect it to work.

Anyone have a clue where my missing item went? There's no 0 item, before you ask.

Click to shrink...

Sounds like a case of "sibling borrowed something and put it back in the wrong spot" to me. Possibly multiple somethings.

 

[Scygnus]

Sounds like a case of "sibling borrowed something and put it back in the wrong spot" to me. Possibly multiple somethings.

Click to shrink...

Snnnnrk. It's not actually physical objects. I was being vague on purpose, but putting it like that is hilarious!

But that's definitely not the case. Somehow there are 192 items on the list, all 192 are accounted for, and then there's one more thing that somehow doesn't make the count come up 193. I've checked and I'm still baffled.

 

[heralding_bubble]

So I have a list of 192 items, named and numbered, from 1 to 204. 116-120 and 123-130 are missing, should be 12 missing in total, giving 192.

Click to shrink...

if it should be 12 missing then you gave the wrong range for missing things, since the missing range count you gave comes up to 13.

edit
1. 116
2. 117
3. 118
4. 119
5. 120
6. 123
7. 124
8. 125
9. 126
10. 127
11. 128
12. 129
13. 130

 

[evildice]

Snnnnrk. It's not actually physical objects. I was being vague on purpose, but putting it like that is hilarious!

But that's definitely not the case. Somehow there are 192 items on the list, all 192 are accounted for, and then there's one more thing that somehow doesn't make the count come up 193. I've checked and I'm still baffled.

Click to shrink...

Have you tried just cutting off the cylinder -- wait, wrong vague problem.

 

[Scygnus]

if it should be 12 missing then you gave the wrong range for missing things, since the missing range count you gave comes up to 13.

Click to shrink...

Oh, I see what I did. I was counting the missing items on my fingers, the first five on one hand and the other 8 on my other, and then missed counting my thumb being down for some damn reason.

Never mind, crisis over, I'm just blind and apparently can't count.