Snake/Eater
Myth Maker of the North
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2015
- Messages
- 6,421
- Likes received
- 7,565
And he won the election like a mary-sue for the GoP.He made his real estate career as a conman. He made his show business career as a clown.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And he won the election like a mary-sue for the GoP.He made his real estate career as a conman. He made his show business career as a clown.
http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&clip_id=4107#.WJUuibp1PqY.email
http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtal...ers-debate-making-california-a-sanctuary-sta/
You know, the confirmation that illegal immigrants use false IDs and stolen Social Security numbers would explain where a few million of Hillary's votes came from.
People's opinion of Tump:Trump said:Any negative polls are fake news, just like the CNN, ABC, NBC polls in the election. Sorry, people want border security and extreme vetting.
Trump said:I call my own shots, largely based on an accumulation of data, and everyone knows it. Some FAKE NEWS media, in order to marginalize, lies!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...er-that-gave-bannon-seat-at-nsc-meetings.htmlWhat Does The Fox Say said:President Trump was reportedly not fully briefed on the executive order he signed that allowed his chief strategist Steve Bannon a seat at the meetings of the country's top national security efforts.
Breitbart has been upfront about what it is for years. CNN has been coasting on a reputation earned 40 years ago.
He's mostly right though; his only failing in saying that was not expanding his statement to include all polls being fake news. The fact that every single one said he was going to lose the election should have clued everyone in on that.Trump continues to reject reality:
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/828574430800539648\
People's opinion of Tump:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx
53% Disapproval
42% Approval
Ha! I got another one from Reddit:I see your subversion of sports with political commentary.
PresidentTrump invited the Pope for lunch on his mega yacht, the Pope accepted and during lunch, a puff of wind blew the Pontiff's hat off, right into the water. It floated off about 50 feet, then the wind died down and it just stayed in place.
The crew and the secret service were scrambling to launch a boat to go get it, when Trump waved them off, saying "Never mind, boys, I'll get it."
The Donald climbed over the side of the yacht, walked on the water to the hat, picked it up, walked back on the water, climbed onto the yacht, and handed the Pope his hat. The crew was speechless. The security team and the Pope's entourage were speechless. Not even the Pope knew what to say.
But that afternoon, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC, CNN all knew how to cover the story. Their banner headlines read, "TRUMP CAN'T SWIM!"
Looks like Trump is keeping up Michelle's ideals of getting America fit again.
One day in office and he has thousands of people getting up and going out for walks on this beautiful Saturday morning.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-fivethirtyeight-gave-trump-a-better-chance-than-almostHe's mostly right though; his only failing in saying that was not expanding his statement to include all polls being fake news. The fact that every single one said he was going to lose the election should have clued everyone in on that.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...rump-a-better-chance-than-almost-anyone-else/
So your article says that the methodology behind the polls was flawed, as well as the fact that Democrat pundits were heavily criticizing any results that didn't show Hillary winning by an overwhelming landslide; how does that in any way serve to undermine my statement that we should no longer trust polls?https://fivethirtyeight.com/feature...rump-a-better-chance-than-almost-anyone-else/
Sorry, was posting from my phone.
So your article says that the methodology behind the polls was flawed, as well as the fact that Democrat pundits were heavily criticizing any results that didn't show Hillary winning by an overwhelming landslide; how does that in any way serve to undermine my statement that we should no longer trust polls?
538 said:Tuesday's results were similar. We strongly disagree with the idea that there was a massive polling error. Instead, there was a modest polling error, well in line with historical polling errors, but even a modest error was enough to provide for plenty of paths to victory for Trump. We think people should have been better prepared for it. There was widespread complacency about Clinton's chances in a way that wasn't justified by a careful analysis of the data and the uncertainties surrounding it.
That someone knows more about a subject doesn't make them any less likely to lie or deceive, it just makes them better at it. That's why lawyers are a thing. Also, it feels like admitting that Trump has yet to actually overstep his authority is as painful for the guy as having his teeth pulled through his ears.This is a really interesting read. Not sure how legitimate his argument is, but he voices a lot of my concerns in a more intellectual way and he has a lot more experience with this stuff than any of us I imagine.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/06/opinion/executive-power-run-amok.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
Are you going to actually contribute to the conversation, or are you just going to keep quoting sources without establishing context? Because if it's the latter, then I'm sorry; that doesn't constitute an argument, and you fail at debating.
He got less votes than Hilary. Given that winning the EC but losing the popular vote is supposed to be very uncommon, it is entirely reasonable to predict that he would lose. Because if we had a popular vote system, he would have lost.He's mostly right though; his only failing in saying that was not expanding his statement to include all polls being fake news. The fact that every single one said he was going to lose the election should have clued everyone in on that.
That someone knows more about a subject doesn't make them any less likely to lie or deceive, it just makes them better at it. That's why lawyers are a thing. Also, it feels like admitting that Trump has yet to actually overstep his authority is as painful for the guy as having his teeth pulled through his ears.
http://www.breitbart.com/national-s...s-envoy-religious-freedom-not-absolute-right/
Wut? Can I become straight, please?
EDIT: No seriously, what the fuck?
https://mobile.twitter.com/lamknight7/status/828582829063798784
https://mobile.twitter.com/PolitiKellyRite/status/828644404252569601
https://mobile.twitter.com/MissLizzyNJ/status/828582976325812225
It's arguable that he got less votes; especially considering what was revealed during Jill Stein's short-lived push for a recount. Personally, I am convinced that Hillary cheated her ass off (as she did in pretty much every aspect of the election), and the MSM (who by and large conducted and reported on the polls) helped her at every turn they could. There's a reason, after all, why Trump is still pushing for an investigation into the election; and my assumption is that he's trying to strip Hillary of the popular vote that her diehard supporter are still bandying about as justification to undermine his presidency.He got less votes than Hilary. Given that winning the EC but losing the popular vote is supposed to be very uncommon, it is entirely reasonable to predict that he would lose. Because if we had a popular vote system, he would have lost.
It's both, both people actually being serious and people mocking them.You aren't actually taking those tweets seriously are you? Every single one is a joke meant to mock how the liberals reacted to Trump's win as far as I can tell.
I mean, we had temporary Dem leader saying how stolen SocSec numbers and fake IDs are common amongst illegal immigrants, and without the anti-fraud voting prevention methods being blocked by Democrats as "racist"...It's arguable that he got less votes; especially considering what was revealed during Jill Stein's short-lived push for a recount. Personally, I am convinced that Hillary cheated her ass off (as she did in pretty much every aspect of the election), and the MSM (who by and large conducted and reported on the polls) helped her at every turn they could. There's a reason, after all, why Trump is still pushing for an investigation into the election; and my assumption is that he's trying to strip Hillary of the popular vote that her diehard supporter are still bandying about as justification to undermine his presidency.
All of those dead people voting, explained.http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&clip_id=4107#.WJUuibp1PqY.email
http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtal...ers-debate-making-california-a-sanctuary-sta/
You know, the confirmation that illegal immigrants use false IDs and stolen Social Security numbers would explain where a few million of Hillary's votes came from.
Bullshit. Hilary got several million more votes than Trump, and there are no signs of fraud on that level.It's arguable that he got less votes; especially considering what was revealed during Jill Stein's short-lived push for a recount. Personally, I am convinced that Hillary cheated her ass off (as she did in pretty much every aspect of the election), and the MSM (who by and large conducted and reported on the polls) helped her at every turn they could. There's a reason, after all, why Trump is still pushing for an investigation into the election; and my assumption is that he's trying to strip Hillary of the popular vote that her diehard supporter are still bandying about as justification to undermine his presidency.
Spare us your attempts at killing the messenger, Breitbart is as valid a source as any media outlet.
It's both, both people actually being serious and people mocking them.
Eh, I grabbed at random.None of the three you linked are people being serious though.
I do remember the hashtag trending last night, so I won't be surprised if there's some people out there being serious, but all three of your examples are jokes.
Be ready to cite your source, admit that your evidence is anecdotal, or concede the debate.
No it is not. Breitbart outright lies and fabricates news stories. They are not a credible source.Spare us your attempts at killing the messenger, Breitbart is as valid a source as any media outlet.
Mwahaha! Join me, we can debate the political alignments of every Dorito flavor!Anyways I gotta get ready for work and I find myself posting repeatedly in this thread when I said I'd try not to! /shakes fist angrily, all your fault Warp!
The New York Times has published outright fabricated stories, as has the Washington Post, as has CNN. As have most (all?) major media outlets.No it is not. Breitbart outright lies and fabricates news stories. They are not a credible source.
Whereas I won't even bother trying to convince you otherwise; the election and everything after has shown me that there is little point in arguing with those who refuse to listen.Bullshit. Hilary got several million more votes than Trump, and there are no signs of fraud on that level.
The reason Trump is pushing an investigation is because he is a thin skinned manchild who cannot abide any slight to his ego.
I won't even get started on the nonsense of accusing her of cheating.
Everyone does that; from the New York Times to the Guardian. A better criticism in this day and age would be that he only provided a single source; because at least with multiple sources, we can compare them and adjust for bias.No it is not. Breitbart outright lies and fabricates news stories. They are not a credible source.
Citation of said stories. In order to compare to what Breitbart has done, they have to have outright sought from the start to make a false news story, to the point of having several people working on it.The New York Times has published outright fabricated stories, as has the Washington Post, as has CNN. As have most (all?) major media outlets.
.
No they don't. Please provide evidence of the NYT or similar papers doing something on par with the false ACORN scandal, or the planned parenthood scandal. Both of which were literally made up.