• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

Questions about unwritten rules

Childe Roland

I use math. Roll for SAN damage
Joined
Jul 19, 2021
Messages
599
Likes received
4,096
Pursuant to the discussion about unwritten rules in the QQ rants thread (kicked off here, and continued through (at the time of this posting) to this page, I was wondering about a couple of matters and would greatly appreciate clarification on them:

1) If I see someone going straight up "F' the rules, I don't care about them, and I don't care if I break them," should I bring that to the mods attention, or do the mods prefer to let such users accumulate enough infractions to trigger a ban naturally?

2) I don't see anything in the rules about bad faith debating, so is there an unwritten rule about that, does it fall under an existing rule (rule 1, maybe?), or is it a case of "just stop interacting with them" instead?

Edit: Fixed a link.
 
Last edited:
Not speaking for the whole moderation team here - I'm still very new - but:
1) If I see someone going straight up "F' the rules, I don't care about them, and I don't care if I break them," should I bring that to the mods attention, or do the mods prefer to let such users accumulate enough infractions to trigger a ban naturally?
From what I've seen, we don't punish people for roleplaying like they're too cool for school, we just don't show them much, if any, leniency when deciding what punishments we give them for actually punishment-worthy behaviour. That doesn't mean banning them necessarily, but it might mean threadbanning, or a mute/temp-ban, where we'd usually just give a warning.

Of course, if they accompany that 'I don't care' attitude with a challenge to ban them, we'll very generously grant their wish.
2) I don't see anything in the rules about bad faith debating, so is there an unwritten rule about that, does it fall under an existing rule (rule 1, maybe?), or is it a case of "just stop interacting with them" instead?
There's nothing specifically about bad faith debating. If they're derailing the thread, or refusing to drop topics when OPs have requested them to, that's a Rule 5 issue. If they're insulting others, that'd be Rule 1, though there's more leeway in Rants.
 
From what I've seen, we don't punish people for roleplaying like they're too cool for school, we just don't show them much, if any, leniency when deciding what punishments we give them for actually punishment-worthy behaviour.
So, I should just let it happen naturally, then. I thought that might be the case after the guy in the QQ Rants thread said he'd never read the rules, and implied that he didn't care/intend to, and two mods commented on the topic without anything happening, but I wanted to be sure.
There's nothing specifically about bad faith debating.
Okay, just wanted to be sure I hadn't missed something/overlooked a detail.

Thanks for clarifying all of that.
Cosign both of these.
And thank you for confirming.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top