Can you quote me what Wildbow actually said?
Can't find the exact citation, but I've seen it shouted N times by Lacks' supporters. And it's correct. Canon Taylor is basically incapable of accepting compromises suggested by anyone else, and always excuses her own stupidity to herself.
Go read the thing, the whole thing, then read it again with the comments from beginning to end (or just skim through the comments if you can't stand to reread it). Focus on paying attention to Taylor's character development (because Lacks categorically refused to write giant robots). She always comes back to the "woe is me martyr", without fail! Interesting characters keep getting used as ablative armour for her morality/ego (see the Endbringer fight in India where she didn't report the cultists on sight followed by extermination) and the author killed the S9 with a muggle to prevent her from ever pulling her head out of her ass and learning that killing is often the best solution available.
The first
massed complaints that directly predicted the final problems were on page 18-19 of a 966 page thread, by Drich (18), aguy, Ivar, and blackmamuth, so 2% of the way in.
Hell, there was a comment on IIRC page 10 that's hilarious in hindsight as "THE ECONOMY, FOOLS!" as Europa Universalis 4 would call it!
Then on page 13 mackon sayeth Taylor seemed "completely clueless" to counter Lacks' Page 11 blatant lies of "her current priority is hero-ing. More specifically, it's hero-ing
well, and not repeating her mistakes."
Oh, and Brellin shows up on page 21, Blackmane on page 23, and Larekko12 on 24 with the same basic issues.
The first announced quit was on page 25 with Kellanved's "It's like reading Panacea." and even
landcollector (one of the staunchest supporters) expressed unease on 25 with "her hesitance and paranoia is starting to get a little frustrating"
ShadowCub and Inverness arrive on Page 26. The complaints die down after page 47 or so as people basically gave up for a while.
Page 100-102 see a spike.
Page 123 starts the first multi-person call for lethality AKA sentient lifeform level intelligence.
seether and TheProffesor on page 139 are worth reading. So is what I call Inverness's Prophecy on page 141.
One million+ words of the protagonist waffling and getting slapped about despite being overpowered
and learning absolutely nothing, remaining the same dumb idiot and making the same mistakes
Once upon a dream, I thought ACP Taylor could not have been a sapient lifeform with its complete inability to learn anything whatsoever.
Then I realized that merely sentient life would be smarter, and only sapient life can make itself that stupid on purpose.
Even "Stereotypical Stupid Teens" know that some guy you know is going to gleefully look to kill more people is someone you put down terminally. No, not "gouge out his eyes" if there's powers or tech that can regrow them, "vaporize" is the only morally correct option in dealing with them. ACP killed the S9 off-screen to prevent Taylor from ever learning that very basic life lesson that's the reason animals are usually more scared of humans than vice versa.
A lion kills a gazelle? The other gazelles are glad it wasn't them. A lion kills a hyena? The others are upset but don't swarm the lion as they know they'll get hurt or killed. A lion kills a human? We hunt that fucker DOWN! And the result? Most lions nowadays don't attack humans if there are easier prey or unless particularly hungry.
Taylor refuses to understand that if you claim a Mandate to Protect, you are obligated to act in the name of that Mandate as efficiently as possible. Which means that in the handling of repeat offenders you know will just kill more people in the 99% chance of them breaking out again, letting them live throws away your Mandate, because you have consciously chosen to not protect the public, instead you have chosen to protect your ego.
The sides of the dispute on Worm morality almost always come down to two factions:
One side prizes individual decisions above all else. This group naturally includes the likes of anti-vaxxers, etc.
The other side believes that if you aren't willing to potentially sacrifice anything and/or everything, including your personal beliefs, personal identity, innocence, etc. in the protection of others, you haven't reached the pinnacle of heroism. You are not one of the true watchers on the wall, giving everything to hold back the barbarian hordes for one more day.