• The regular administrative staff are taking a vacation, and in the meantime, Biigoh is taking over. See here for more information.
  • A notice about Rule 3 regarding sites hosting pirated/unauthorized content has been made. Please see here for details.
  • Staff is working to deal with the problem of synonymous tags. See here for more information and to suggest tag mergers.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.

What are your most hated fanfic tropes

vinzzz001 said:
I strongly dislike the non-killing heroic MCs. Especially if they go out of their way to save the villain, who just murdered and tortured kids or so. Not just not killing them, but actively preventing villains from dying because of their own stupidity.

Oh, and the MC is totally okay with committing any other crimes apart from killing for their own convenience.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Why? I mean it's usually done badly, but it could be done in a good way where the hero will just cripple the villain if they are at the level where death is warranted. In fact it'd be kind of interesting to have a worm fic where the MC takes a no killing drawback and instead just uses gray boy powers or turns the bad guy into a Servitor if they are evil enough to warrant death. At first criminals laugh at the no killing rule then the find him the most terrifying.

- YouTube

Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
m.youtube.com m.youtube.com

- YouTube

Profitez des vidéos et de la musique que vous aimez, mettez en ligne des contenus originaux, et partagez-les avec vos amis, vos proches et le monde entier.
m.youtube.com m.youtube.com
 
My problem with 'no killing' rule is that I often see that has with a moral logic that is honestly not tied to any sense of good or evil.

So, let's say you don't kill because killing is bad.
So you would logically force the state to never kill.
But that never happens. For the MC, the government is somehow above their rule.

That not to say that often for those it doesn't matter whether you are killing someone who arguably deserves it, like Gihren Zabi.
The 'kill' is bad, worse than the bad guy who killed millions.

Come on. Killing is an action, it can either be a good action or a bad one.
You can kill people like Griffith, Gihren, Jamitov, Blue Cosmos, Joker and others, and others. That would not be a bad act.

Now if you kill the guy crossing the street? You are evil.

Often those guys SEEM critically unable to differentiate both, which means they are unable to say what is good or what is evil, to which the main question is 'why are you playing superhero then? You don't have the condition to do that '
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top