Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, she told him to fuck off in front of everyone.Armsy offered her a place in the Wards, but he Armsmaster'd the pitch and she declared for New Wave instead. Since then, she's demonstrated the ability to grow into a full-scale dragon and took down Inago (AKA Skitter!Lung). Having a cape like that in 'his' Wards program would be utterly priceless in terms of reflected glory, and he seems to have decided that no matter what she wants, she's going be a Ward.
What'd it look like before?Due to numerous comments about how I seem to be forcing the story, I've decided to rewrite the very end.
In front of everyone, or in front of New Wave?
I really should just re-read.
What'd it look like before?
Also, she's in luck--the truancy officer is named Michael Allen.
It has been ruled that a school classroom and public areas do not hold any particular expectation of privacy.One thing to be aware of is that a lot of the rulings on recording are relatively recent. I can't seem to find the ruling on personal recordings in a school mentioned here, if it is not something you just made up.
I do know that until Illinois' anti-eavesdropping law was struck down in 2014, doing what Taylor is doing was illegal in Illinois and had been since the 1960's. I believe it had a ripple effect on other two-party consent States.
If this is following the canon timeline, the ruling you cite probably hasn't happened yet as those came AFTER this:
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/illinois-supreme-court-strikes-down-eavesdropping-law/
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news...e-court-eavesdropping-law-20140320-story.html
In any case, I got in trouble over such recordings in the mid '90s when I had the same problem with evidence as Taylor in this story.
It has been ruled that a school classroom and public areas do not hold any particular expectation of privacy.
So long as all interested parties are aware of an ongoing recording, especially audio (recording video of kids is a can of worms) unless the school authorities themselves do not state that no recording can go on, it's effectively legal.
Covert recording is definitely a crime, though. This is why she's going over-the-top overt. Giving everyone a chance to watch what they say.
NH is all-party.Depends on what state Brockton Bay is in.
CT is a one Party consent state, as is RI, and New York, and New Jersey.
Massachusetts is two-party, and ignores that whole expectation of privacy thing. It's just strait up illegal
So, as usual for Worm, laws have changed significantly from Real Life.
Probably not the word you're looking for, unless Blackwell has strong feeling on copyright laws.But you will not release this recording into the public domain without my express permission.
That just means it's time to brigade over to the vote thread.Evil cliffhanger is Evil!
Especially when it's likely to be almost a year before we get enough votes to see the next chapter.
Basically she means, don't hand it out to the papers.Carol's real superpower is lawyering.
Probably not the word you're looking for, unless Blackwell has strong feeling on copyright laws.
Then it should just be 'release it to the public'.
She said what she said. People do that all the time.
I am not doubting that, I was pointing out that I can't find any evidence of such rulings before 2014 with Google. Especially in 2-party States.It has been ruled that a school classroom and public areas do not hold any particular expectation of privacy.
When you can Google Earth Bet's legal system, let me know.I am not doubting that, I was pointing out that I can't find any evidence of such rulings before 2014 with Google. Especially in 2-party States.
I can find the 1986 ruling about security cameras in schools, but that is different from a student carrying a recording device.
I am not doubting that, I was pointing out that I can't find any evidence of such rulings before 2014 with Google. Especially in 2-party States.
I can find the 1986 ruling about security cameras in schools, but that is different from a student carrying a recording device.
I'm surprised Gladly did back down and not try to confiscate the tape recorder "For safekeeping, since obviously it is causing a disruption in class" or respond to her challenge that "YOU are the one disrupting class. I did not see them trying to do any such thing, only you causing a disruption. If it is such a temptation for theft, maybe you should not bring it to class and display it so openly.". I'm wondering how the "disrupting class" argument would play out with written permission from Blackwell.I stood, suddenly enough that he took a step back. Mr Gladly was about my height, or maybe a little shorter. "So when other people want to take my property and I make a fuss about it, I'm suddenly the problem?" I shook my head. "I'll be quiet. So long as nobody else tries to take my stuff."
He hesitated, clearly not wanting to escalate matters, until I sat down. Then he headed back up to the front, doing his best not to make it look like a retreat. I didn't care. While I was fully aware of the glares of Madison and Julia—who had managed to slide back into her seat while Gladly was occupied with me—I didn't care about that either.
End of Part Fifteen
Legally she has to prominently display it so that nobody can claim they didn't know they were being recorded. That is in direct opposition to "not display it so openly".I'm surprised Gladly did back down and not try to confiscate the tape recorder "For safekeeping, since obviously it is causing a disruption in class" or respond to her challenge that "YOU are the one disrupting class. I did not see them trying to do any such thing, only you causing a disruption. If it is such a temptation for theft, maybe you should not bring it to class and display it so openly.". I'm wondering how the "disrupting class" argument would play out with written permission from Blackwell.
Both of which are tactics I've been on the receiving end of, although neither time was the item a tape recorder.
I did try a mini-cassette recorder (this was mid '90s and the tape recorder belonged to a relative and was not new) and that just got confiscated with threats to have me arrested and charged for violating Illinois wiretapping law (which was not struck down until the 2014, almost 20 years later) if I made too much of a fuss. I never did see the recorder again.
I just had another thought. The line with Blackwell saying "You may not release this into the Public Domain" instead of "release it to the public" means that they could release it to the public with the Creative Commons License. If she protests, they can play back her saying "public domain" and show that they used the CCL instead, which is legally NOT public domain.
Sorry, it's just honestly the stuff I had to put up with in real life. Including the contrived excuses and victim blaming of "If it's going to cause a disruption by people trying to steal it, you should not bring it to class. Leave it at home next time. You don't need it.".Legally she has to prominently display it so that nobody can claim they didn't know they were being recorded. That is in direct opposition to "not display it so openly".
Mr Gladly has the moral spine of wet tissue paper. He does whatever he has to, to remain as the 'cool' teacher. That does not include confiscating stuff by force.
That's actually gone both ways in different states, and sometimes in the same state with different judges.Sorry, it's just honestly the stuff I had to put up with in real life. Including the contrived excuses and victim blaming of "If it's going to cause a disruption by people trying to steal it, you should not bring it to class. Leave it behind next time. You don't need it.".
In my case there was the very real threat of me violating the wiretapping law that I mentioned being struck down in 2014, a law I'd never heard of until that point but a trip to the library (no internet access at home in those days. My dad was either out of work or just getting a job after a couple years of sporadic unemployment and my only computer was an obsolete Apple IIGS, This was around the 1994/95 school year and while the school and library had just added internet, access and availability was limited) verified it's existence. We couldn't afford an attorney due to having been on hard times since 1992.Or if there's damage and your parents are backing you, if it's destroyed/confiscated, you can target the teacher and file theft/destruction of property charges...which has led to some interesting fun times with this kind of thing, such as it being in small claims and escalating to putting a lien on their property and eventual reposession for sale to recover damages