First- this disease doesn't appear to be much more deadly than measles in spite of us having no developed resistance to it, while everyone's developed some resistance to measles (either by inherited immunity or inoculation).
... umm. No.
And measles in a person with no resistance is far more deadly than Wuhan Flu.
Again,
not a flu.
Second- it predominately kills the elderly and the sickly. Young, healthy people (aka: the labor force) are not at little risk individually, and at no risk as a whole. Hell, chances are good it won't even kill enough young people to make much dent in the unemployment numbers once things pass and the economy recovers.
We'll see a massive loss of retirees, but not workers. Now, a civilization where everyone's mourning their parents and/or grandparents is going to be a tragedy to behold... but it's not likely to collapse.
No.
This is not only wrong, it's
fucking stupid. As I've pointed out before, it's not a binary "you die or you don't" thing.
Known long-term complications include lung damage, septic shock,
brain damage... and the list is still growing.
Or, as I put it before:
Moreover, the death rate isn't the rate of long term complications. The data I've seen is highly preliminary, but it seems that anywhere from something like 5-50% (highly preliminary data means small sample sizes and thus large confidence intervals) of cases result in a substantial, permanent loss of lung capacity, for instance.
Here is a popular-level summary of the data I was referring to.
Here is another popular level summary which details related issues.
Stop looking at just the death rates when talking about the social consequences of this stuff.
What we're going to see is a shitton of people who have been severely, permanently injured by this stuff... and we're going to see
more of that if the hospitals get overloaded... which it's increasingly looking like they
will.
Worse, hospitals are
already running out of protective equipment for their workers... and we're
already short on medical personnel. The healthcare system is going to take a massive hit to its capacity
right as we need that capacity the most.
This means that the disease is going to be
more deadly soon, with
more long term complications (that could have been prevented with treatment).
Third- for the Americas, there's a lot of space between population centers, which slows contagion... the flattened bell-curve will greatly reduce the strain on healthcare resources and minimize the death tolls. Now, obviously the western hemisphere aren't the only civilizations in the world, but if necessary then North America has the resources and historical propensity to rebuild in the unlikely event anyone else collapses.
Yeah, no. The data we've seen
very much does not support this assertion.
I
hope you're right, and you
are right in that human society will survive this... somehow. We're not looking at a Mad Max outcome. The shape we'll be in after... now
that is the question.
The correct analogy, though, isn't the World Wars. It's a combination of a polio epidemic and the Spanish Flu... and we're looking at the return of -- in general status, if not specifics -- the age of the iron lungs.