Larekko12
Connoisseur.
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 17,822
- Likes received
- 54,919
But it's a bad end of the Stepford Smiler sort. It might not have the body counts of canon which you were wrong to compare due to inequivalent circumstances and lack of same external modifiers.It was written to show up the contrast between a happy ending, and how it was achieved.
It's still a bad end and the rest of the Dallons having their agency knifed in the back and buried it quietly.
And it's something that could easily end up worse than canon by and order of magnitude if the wrong thinker is in the right place and she gets made as Heartbreaker redux.
This is what I'm talking about. This is the kind of talk that gets you on watch list Ack. I mean I'm going to have to do the nuclear option but Panacea quest for when I read it did this better than you.
You are literally saying that Stockholm is perfectly okay to build relationship because at the end of the day they're both happy. You are saying that amortentia and the Gaunts are okay so long as the Girl keeps the man dosed and takes care of him.
In P quest Amy makes as girl as lesbian. This girl asks for it repeatedly. Amy protests to make very very sure she's doing it because she wants it.
Then she does it.
Besides lines crossed later that was A okay and can't be called rape. It's voluntary surgery.
Mark was bad becuase she didn't ask him about before even if it would have been perfectly fine.
Carol was mindrape that she actively protested and got pissed at and then because of the way she was changed and combined with Marks change she's getting raped and Mark is because they're no longer in the positions to actually consent of their own free will.