Sunk-cost fallacy was picking anything to do with Twilight in the first place.
Refusing to get a free confident for white-knighting reasons again is just snaching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Shaper, I am quite tired. I do apologize if I am a bit blunt and dull in this, but again, I am quite tired of this.
I'm... well, yes, I am talking directly to you, but not only you. You just tend to be the most vocal about this.
Yes people are arguing on a dozen different things, waste or not, worth or not and some arguing for and against and how it might or might not-
I don't care. Not right now. Not important. Not... Not important. I'm not talking about that. Or at least I'm not talking about that in the same way I'm not talking about anything, and I'm talking about everything.
This. This? This... this everything. I would wiggle my arms and gesture at the everything if I could, but that's what I'm referring to. Not you, not here, not this, but...
this everything.
This is a difference of aims.
I, am going to guess here. And I am likely to be wrong. I'm likely to mischaracterize... again,
the everything, but I don't know how to not.
From what you've said, where you've voted, how you've argued, what you've said you are aiming for, I am going to have to guess.... That you want to Win.
There were 3 Victory conditions that exist, stated from start of the quest, and you want to Win. You want to grab that, and it will be Won because the Quest was Won. Because that is true.
You want to Win. The Wolf, like, it's right there. It Literally gets us exactly what it says on the tin. It solves the problem, it is three actions away from Winning, and bam. Goal met. Aim done. We Win, no ifs, ands, or buts about it. Definitionally, it is a success.
From that, it's... frustrating? I am guessing here, but you seem frustrated. And angry. Because... what the hell? We keep not doing that. We keep not aiming for Victory. Did we not read the same warning from Baldomare, where if we know a path to Victory, claim it? That we aren't some special wunderkind, but just lucky and managed to get this far? We keep taking actions that might be a mistake, and that don't directly carry us to victory, that don't help in anyway. And then we just waste actions? What the hell? It's infuriating.
And, And! Even when you do choose to go along with the "common voice" as it tends to be, we take stupid decisions like with Twilight here. As a Confidant, she is obviously more helpful than she would be otherwise. Right now she's nothing more than a lingering pit of gunk that's not helpful to anyone. So if we took the actions to get here, we should at least get the prize at the bottom. Turning it away is just... not only reckless and dangerous as it leaves loose threads, it's downright negative utility! It's less than pointless, it's actively wasting everyone's time and energy and the very precious action economy.
I
see that, okay? I see that and it's mind mindbogglingly irritating.
Now. That, wrong as I may be, I see as your Aim. Not specifically yours, but this....
this aim. Secure the Win.
I'm going to liken it to... a Speedrun of this Quest. There is a goal, there are actions, and you can measure them against a fixed end position of success. Things either take you closer, or further from it.
To torture this metaphor, that's not the type of "Run" that most here seem to be aiming for.
Most here seem to be more interested in a... Completionist? 100%? True Ending? That kinda thing. None of those really fit because you can't do everything, you don't know the true path, and there isn't really a True Ending, as far as Our Lady has said. People are instead focused on... that idea of it. Not a Perfect Run, but on a "Good" Run. Doing the things that are "Right."
But, that's also not really possible. Or at least, not the "run" that is happening. Velvet has made... so many mistakes. Votes have gone haywire, and if there was a "Good" Ending, then with the Wolf Actions that have been taken, it would make sense that we are "Locked" out of it. But People are still trying to aim in that direction.
Less guided by sheer action economy, or comparable progress towards a fixed win, or speed of completion or anything like that. But more a... wobbly moral values, do what we can and try to not regret if things go wrong follow the heart, head, feet, kinda path. Which, inevitably, leads to worse decisions exploring extraneous paths. Wastes time, actions come to nothing, and unoptimal choices are made for a moral reason that may or may not even have a reward at the end. And a reward we might even just straight up ignore!
I
get it. You are probably defining the "Right" action as the one that succeeds and gets towards Victory, and I/we/they/us are defining the "Right" action on vague, wobbly, moral sliding scale choices. One has a way, way, way harder, definitive edge to it. Provably useful too. The other.... fails. A lot.
I hope you can understand that. The... motive. The motivation. The reasoning behind this.
If you are aiming towards Victory, and others are aiming at a
Type of Victory then things will constantly be at odds. Both sides demanding that they are right because of how they have defined it, and that definition,
definitionally making the others wrong.
I
get it. And I'm trying to reach over to understand where you are and where you're at. I, personally, value the "Trying to do what is Right as it is made increasingly more difficult to paint anything as Pure Right" aim of action. A fair few people do. Simply refusing that outright in discussion just... it just means people aren't going to listen.