Firstly, you'll be given the opportunity to defend your intent to your mod accuser, and they've been quite just in their mission thus far. If you feel a mod has been unjust in his decision you should be able to escalate to an admin or supermod or whatever. If both of those agree that your fic is actually thinly veiled politics, you MAY get banned. After discussing it with you they'd likely just remove your fic and hand out a warning or temp ban. We're not dealing with SV here.
Next order of business: change my title to "Hypothetical Illuminati Death Bot".
But you see, alethiophile, your using such a title would provide sufficient evidence to make it more than a mere hypothesis.
Postulated Illuminati Death Bot would be ideal then.
The glory of the Axiomatic Illuminati Deathbot.
You do realize you're the primary person QQ has to thank for the rule in the first place, right?
It's weird, usually people who participate in threads a lot are sad to see them shut down. Like, even if they understand why it was done, losing something that was worth participating in a bunch of times before is seen as a loss. But you sound like you're happy with this outcome, downright smug.
It's not about a persecution complex. It's about not trusting a collection of people whom you've never met to all have the same intuitive interpretation of things that you do. That's why people try to establish clear boundaries around rules, so they can be assured of following it without having to ask clarification in 100 times as many cases as necessary.
Yes, but it sounds funny enough that if you wrote it somewhere else I'd want to read it.
This. So much this.
....
Everyone would be triggered. No one would be safe.
AND WHEN EVERYONE'S TRIGGERED... no-one will be. [/meme]
Are you ready to supplicate your new AI Overlord, Google-sama?
