Snake/Eater
Myth Maker of the North
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2015
- Messages
- 6,421
- Likes received
- 7,561
we hit her so hard that she becomes brain damaged and heal everything but her short term memory.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we hit her so hard that she becomes brain damaged and heal everything but her short term memory.
While my explanation was a bit generalized, it doesn't make it any less true.
You spend the next minute trying to carefully word your offer before you finally say "So... I was thinking about your problem with uh conceiving. I could probably make it so you could have kids again if you want and I could also help you get revenge on those that hurt you. But in return I will need your help in destroying the Empire."
"No thank you." she says without looking up from her work.
"But-"
"No thank you." she says again but more firmly this time.
And THAT is why my vote had not a single mention of E88. She's now completely disregarded our offer of healing her, and will not think on it later, we blasted it against her programming and the programming won, we needed to nudge it in, not try to hammer it in.Because we were advocating for the destruction of the Empire, the literal raison d'être of Night's existence..... on a faulty assumption without evidence.
because you didn't add a dialogue.We're Fae, manipulating mortals should be instinctual... So why do we suck at it so much?
The thing is, "overgeneralizing" means that you're generalizing to the point where it isn't true anymore.While my explanation was a bit generalized, it doesn't make it any less true.
It all comes down to them fixing her so NOTHING will ever be more important to her than the cause. It's one of the reasons man are/were turned into eunuchs as well.
every time I've included dialog with my vote, and the vote won, the opposite of my dialog has happened...
I know some women who have gotten their tubes tied myself. But it's only a small % of women who can have that done without psychological effects.The thing is, "overgeneralizing" means that you're generalizing to the point where it isn't true anymore.
Hell, I know a good number of women who are actively trying to get themselves sterilized.
And your comment about women's instincts, especially in the context of brainwashing? No. Just no.
... "Physiological" doesn't mean what you think it does.I know some women who have gotten their tubes tied myself. But it's only a small % of women who can have that done without physiological effects.
Uh, no. It doesn't work like that. At all. If you want an actual introduction to that sort of thing, I'd suggest you start here, although if it's anything like the edition I studied in grad school (the 10th), there are serious problems with a few of the chapters that I'd want to supplement with external research.If you do a bit of research into genetics, you'll find that male/female is determined by a bit more than 'X' or 'Y'; there are different types of X and Y chromosomes that actually lead to there being 26 distinct genetic gender identities (not counting mutations/defects that lead to people like hermaphrodites, which usually happens from an XXY chromosome setup). Of the 13 female genetic gender identities:
2 are asexual
1 is "a man in a women's body"
4 have strong maternal instincts
and 4 have weak maternal instincts
(I'd have to do a few hours of research to go into more depth than that, it's been a few years since I've seen the relevant articles, and they were mostly talking about the homosexual and transgendered community)
Again, no. Your understanding of genetics is absurdly wrong, and your attempt to use a 26-part (!) model of gender identity is just plain silly. Then the comments on sterility... no. The loss of the ability to bear children can be traumatic, but it doesn't work the way you seem to think it does. Also, see "any of the ones with maternal instincts," which is an absurdly wrong phrase in this context.That is purely genetics though, environment DOES have an effect. But any of the ones with maternal instincts would be greatly affected by the inability to have a child.
Yes, but that's a non-sequitur, and doesn't support your point anyway.And there is a BIG difference between choosing not to have a child, and having that forced on you.
Yes, and so has just about every form of making someone feel like they've lost control of their selves or their bodies. Forced sterilization isn't even particularly blatant by that standard.Forced sterilization of woman as part of a brainwashing or indoctrinating process HAS been used in the past, so I'm not just talking hypotheticals. It is FAR more common for rape/pleasure to be used instead, but it has happened; usually in cases where the indoctrinating started at a young age.
Name a example, because that sounds like a lazy excuse not to put more thought into a vote you want people to support.every time I've included dialog with my vote, and the vote won, the opposite of my dialog has happened...
Spellchecker victim on physiological, should have been psychological.... "Physiological" doesn't mean what you think it does.
Neither does "effects".
I've done several votes with full paragraphs of dialog written out, at least 2 of which ended up winning, and having some core component of the vote pretty much ignored (probably because no one copying the vote actually copies the dialog...). I'm not digging through 112 pages of the thread to find a specific example though (the search function failed me, no way to search purely within one thread....).Name a example, because that sounds like a lazy excuse not to put more thought into a vote you want people to support.