spiderhellian
Araneae
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2024
- Messages
- 1,000
- Likes received
- 5,306
It's an interesting thought. In-universe one Bureau action has narrative weight in a way most "single actions" does not -- this is the action of hundreds of Equestria's finest, after all. But you raise a good point that Name actions are so high-value...Well, I suppose if we wanted to investigate Windy Flakes, having a Selene AP spent on Consulting is probably more effective than spending an AP using Selene's Knock realization to spy since that's the sort of thing that she'd probably do for free as a subset of helping the Bureau doing so. But doing something like spending a Baldomare AP just to give her Lore as a bonus to a search for expedition action seems absurd compared to just having her spend AP separately. It's the True Strike D&D problem.
The Selene idea is extremely tempting though, we get her better introduced and it gives us a great outlet for the sketchiness that is sending the Bureau after Windy. It's a little... aggressive, might take diplomacy off the table (if e.g. he figures out he is being targeted for investigation by the Lunar Bureau, that's a pretty hostile act from Velvet/a possibly precipitous one), but that might be tolerable.
I do think that the world where Velvet decides "No, Name actions are too valuable for personal empowerment compared to bolstering the Lunar Bureau" is a totally valid choice. It says something about Velvet, is a totally reasonable decision, and that's a good thing.
Last edited: