• The site has now migrated to Xenforo 2. If you see any issues with the forum operation, please post them in the feedback thread.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

General chat thread

Reader mode
I am thinking of creating a thread of Waifu Wars, not actual wars of criticizing waifus or something, more like "present us your Waifu" in a realistic setting, what I mean for a realistic setting is to think really hard about the Waifu and think about actually living with them.
Example: I like Nero from Fate, I live her energy and cheerfulness but I can't imagine living life with someone like her. I feel I would die of a heart attack from the quantity of energy she radiates.
Waifu I could see myself living with will be the Choushin from Tenchi Muyo, apart from the Nigh-Omnipotent Goddess that could destroy 3rd Dimensional Universe by forming an avatar of an avatar inside of it, I think I could live with them I imagine? the major problem would be not ending up as a test subject for any kind of scientific thing that Washu creates.
 
otoshi17Good said:
I am thinking of creating a thread of Waifu Wars, not actual wars of criticizing waifus or something, more like "present us your Waifu" in a realistic setting, what I mean for a realistic setting is to think really hard about the Waifu and think about actually living with them.
Example: I like Nero from Fate, I live her energy and cheerfulness but I can't imagine living life with someone like her. I feel I would die of a heart attack from the quantity of energy she radiates.
Waifu I could see myself living with will be the Choushin from Tenchi Muyo, apart from the Nigh-Omnipotent Goddess that could destroy 3rd Dimensional Universe by forming an avatar of an avatar inside of it, I think I could live with them I imagine? the major problem would be not ending up as a test subject for any kind of scientific thing that Washu creates.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Well, I don't have a Waifu, so I might not participate, but it would probably at least be interesting to look at from the outside, if only for the "Factional Character is your GF/BF" thing, at least.
 
Let's be real, the Choco Taco was always trash. Only reason people are getting upset at its passing is because they associate nostalgic memories with the treat. If everyone now saying they liked the Choco Taco actually bought the Choco Taco they would still be selling the Choco Taco.
 
Last edited:
Ragnarok said:
the Choco Taco
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Every time I see the name, I think to myself 'this needs to be the name of a kinky sex act'.

Then I start thinking of kinky sex acts and trying to find one that hasn't been named and would apply.

Then I get bored and find something slightly more productive to do with my time.

That is the entirety of my emotional experience with the Choco Taco. And it's probably more fulfilling than actually eating one.
 
If someone's uses the words "magic sky daddy" unironically they probably deserve to be punished for jerking it to waifu pics.

Aliens are probably real, no idea about Bigfoot. Parallel universes could go either way, or it could be weirder shit.
 
Daytripper said:
an invisible man in the sky
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
To my knowledge, no religion still in practice actually believes that. There could be some very obscure pagan faith somewhere, but it's very unlikely you've ever met a practitioner.

Daytripper said:
punish if you jerkoff to pics of your Waifu
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I mean... your own biochemistry* punishes you for that, so, umm... have fun with that.

*No joke, studies don't exactly show any desirable connections between regular use of pornography and positive mental health. The only controversy is how bad it is, not if it's bad. A little bit here and there (probably) isn't bad for you, but then, neither is a little bit of junk food. If you're using the word 'waifu' while jerking off, you're probably not in the 'little bit' category. More like a 'box of cookies a day' habit.

Daytripper said:
totally dismiss the idea of extraterrestrial life
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I don't know of anybody that dismisses the idea of extraterrestrial life. Like, at all, ever. Plenty who dismiss the idea of aliens coming to earth and shoving their thumbs up our buttholes, and for good reason, but none who reject the idea that aliens exist.

If anything, my problem is the conga-line of retards who believe the pyramids were made by extraterrestrials.

Daytripper said:
Sasquatch
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Thing is... we've already proven what Sasquatch is. So, at this point it's like claiming you saw Satan when in reality it was just a black goose.

R.b43bb9a8a59736ac92a64533c015e249

Daytripper said:
or parallel universes
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
First of all: 'universe' means everything. All matter, all energy, all space, all time. If parallel realities existed, they'd still be part of the universe. Do you not know what the sideways '8' means?

It means everything. Every conversation you've ever had with your parents. Every conversation you've never had with your parents. All existent expressions of reality.
 
TanaNari said:
First of all: 'universe' means everything. All matter, all energy, all space, all time. If parallel realities existed, they'd still be part of the universe. Do you not know what the sideways '8' means?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You're being pedantic. You know what the term means, it's very straightforward, and there isn't a better term for alternate sets of everything we know or have reason to believe exists.

Also, there's multiple sideways eights with different meanings.
 
TanaNari said:
Though if you wanted to be really pedantic, you'd go with 'parallel layers of reality'.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I've always considered alternate realities to be the same underlying universe, just where things happened differently. Not just alternate timelines - those are a subset - but our reality except with magic. You know, as opposed to things that were never our universe to begin with, like fictional settings.

Point is, you're lumping a bunch of concepts under one term.
 
TanaNari said:
Because those concepts are under 'that one term'.

Not my fault if you want to keep claiming pink isn't a lighter shade of red.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I mean, that's actually a good analogy. You're effectively claiming that, in terms of settings, we only need the word color. I'm saying that we're lacking a distinction between hue and shade, and that parallel universe fits hue in a way no other term we generally use does.

Besides, it's not like it isn't accepted terminology at this point.
 
Amazon Climber said:
I mean, that's actually a good analogy. You're effectively claiming that, in terms of settings, we only need the word color. I'm saying that we're lacking a distinction between hue and shade, and that parallel universe fits hue in a way no other term we generally use does.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

No. 'Universe' would be 'red'. Or, really, it's more like 'universe' is 'color' in this analogy. All possible expressions of light, all shades, even the ones we cannot see because our eyes only see a tiny percentage of of electromagnetic radiations.

Various shades, we can use such words as 'parallel reality' or whatnot. But universe is, by definition, everything.

At least, all real things. Fictitious universes that do not and cannot exist even in the sea of infinity... are, of course, imaginary, and thus not part of the universe.
 
Amazon Climber said:
…Which means alternate universe is a good term for them.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
... I suppose in the same sense as 'alternate facts'. In that they're not facts in the same way fictitious universes aren't universes.

Though I do suppose it also answers Daytripper 's complaining that people don't believe in alternate universes. It's because, by definition, they are fictional.
 
TanaNari said:
If parallel realities existed, they'd still be part of the universe.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
This may be the case for a given definition of 'universe', but the word 'multiverse' exists for a reason, and it's to group together a collection of what you'd call 'realities' but is commonly referred to as 'universes'.
 
TanaNari said:
... I suppose in the same sense as 'alternate facts'. In that they're not facts in the same way fictitious universes aren't universes.

Though I do suppose it also answers Daytripper 's complaining that people don't believe in alternate universes. It's because, by definition, they are fictional.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I mean, it's possible an alternate universe someone believes in actually does exist. ButI wouldn't change terms to describe a hypothetical 'real' alternate universe, because it's both purely speculative and about as likely to exist as one everyone acknowledges is fiction.
 
If alternate universes, parallel realities, or whatever you want to call them do exist, how would we even be able to tell?
 
MadGreenSon said:
So other than that, nothing?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Nothing. Much like reversing time, any process that could even hypothetically breach the barrier between realities would require functionally infinite amounts of energy.

It would, in fact, be more energy efficient to just create a new reality. At least it's possible to assign a number to the minimum amount of power required to pull that off (which is approximately the entire energy output of the Big Bang).
 
Last edited:
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 6 (members: 2, guests: 4)
    Back
    Top