Imperator Pax
Talon Master
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2019
- Messages
- 5,906
- Likes received
- 78,893
More or less, buat least with the conflicts in the south west, and north east... some of the genocide that played out ended up being native on native and thats a realistic concern.Steam trucks should work well.You could probably made airship with steam engines,too.Sadly,not planes.
Not famine - possible.And here we could have no genocide of indians in North America.Which happened,becouse they were conqered by faitful protestants beliving to be New Izrael,and indians - New Caananities.
So they did with indians what jews was supposed to do with old caananities.
When catholic spaniarrds could enslave some indians and kill others ,but not genocide them.
Fun thing is - jews probably never killed caananities,but assimiliated them.....and later made story about fake genocide.
About 1918 - Brest-Litowsk was soviet failure,but they win in the end - thanks to russian parties.
Germans hated working with soviets,and tried to find any replacment for them.
But ALL russian parties declined to abadonn their Allies and made peace.
Poor fools died for dudes who later betrayed them,and made deal with soviets.
The commanche and Apache had sub groups of militant societies who were all in for that and success meant that they won political power. The Lipan come to mind as part of these even into the early 1900s. Further back, the morning wars come to mind where you have a markedly incease in retributive violence between historical rival tribes that ultimately leaves both groups vulnerable to organized state violence by colonial militias or then later the state militias in the 1800s.
Even under spanish rule we see this to a less extent where native on native violence in Peru for example where rival groups adopt 17th century spanish warfare tactics [and that includes mounted warfare which makes it much harder for rival tribes (looking for captives) to escape] to their commensurate results in fall out to the civilian populace. I doubt the intention was intentional genocide, which is itself a neologism, but the practical result was whole tribes went extinct.
And yes historically genocide if we want to use that term is more what we think of as forced assimilation, the modern turkish people are genetically overwhelming indistinguishable from the greeks, the situation being is that when the Seljuks migrated into the plateau they conquered and assimilated, same thing happened the arab conquests a few centuries earlier or the yes the supposed destruction of the canaanites but again that doesn't sound nearly as impressive in oral or written tradition so it gets recorded as 'yeah we came in and killed all the enemy' because that makes the king seem like a big shot. Repeat that ad nauesem to evangelical city on the hill protestants and well 'its a divine mission' and worse, its that logic paired with superior and often increasing weapons disparity.
and I've said this before keeping the bolsheviks from winning the civil war by 1918 requires a clear cut unified leadership, because Lenin & friends hold the two biggest cities in the empire and all the factories that go with them. Riga is defacto independent and then is independent but most of the disparate groups fighting the bolsheviks are more focused on their home areas than marching four hundred miles up the road even before one starts worrying about supplying the army. Lenin's whole reason for moving the soviets to moscow was that practically speaking peter could have been taken as demonstrated by Judenich coming close, and as proven by the Germans taking Riga. Now could Judenich have held petersburg not with out a lot of help and manpower he'd have had among other things shortages of food and ammunition and fuel .
With Wilson in charge of the US there isn't any money for that. Lansing might be down for that but that would require wilson being relieved (say he has a stroke early and worse) and Marshal gets capped but again thats a big what if