Darko
Connoisseur.
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2019
- Messages
- 22,479
- Likes received
- 323,915
Oh gosh no. Certainly not. But it occurred to me when writing this that an actual utilitarian would be a horrifying person wholly lacking in humanity. They'd have to be in order to function.
The thing that annoyed me about V for Vendetta (the comic) is that while the author claimed that he was presenting a choice between fascism and anarchy, he wasn't. Chancellor Susan starts making an ideological defence of his position and it's a well reasoned and rational one, but its immediately undermined by his next statement. V on the other hand is completely committed and we never see the chaos and starvation his actions will cause. We're shown all of the bad of one viewpoint and all of the good of the other.
The same thing happens in the end of Infamous 2. The protagonist is presented with a decision: take a chance on an unreliable cure for a deadly disease or don't. The cure will kill everyone immune to the disease and maybe cure the rest. Alternately, he can side with the antivillain and guarantee the survival of everyone immune to it at the cost of everyone else. Except... That's not the choice. There's no end sequence where the cure is a failure. The game always assumes that it works perfectly, which is frustratingly intellectually dishonest.
The SI used to think that. Then he met people who literally just wanted to watch the world burn.
I read a book a little while ago with a fully sophont gynoid character. Her decisions would be overridden by a human controller, but only if they said 'activate robot slave mode' in a loud and clear voice. This was because her creator felt that people shouldn't be able to sugar coat what they were doing to an intelligent being.
This SI realised that if he didn't have to deal with egos, he could get humanity into space using its own technology easily. He could eliminate despotic regimes... Yes, by becoming a despot himself, but the majority of the species would still experience a significant benefit.
"Would it be moral to mind control one person to prevent atomic armageddon? Two? Five? How about a large, non-nuclear war? Is the limit simply saving more lives than you take? Because I've done that, and at least ninety nine percent of them were entirely necessary."
Yes, but the price of patience is paid in the lives of others. It's not quite the same as not being prepared to put the work in.
While it may have been necessary to mind control people in order to stop war and advance the species, I don't think it would be necessary to turn the good guys into sex toys.
People may accept that him controlling and even potentially killing the League could be needed to accomplish his uplift desires and better humanity, but he didn't need to turn them into sex slaves.
He could have altered their personalities to agree more easily with his methods and follow him without using them for his sexual activities.
The Fantasy one altered those elves to not have their worst habits anymore and maybe to be loyal to him, but he didn't turn them into sex slaves or make them be more attracted to him. They wanted to fuck him not because he made them have that desire, but because he had various qualities they found attractive even before their alteration, power, ruthlessness etc.
There is a difference between necessary evil and plain pointless evil. Mind controlling the population, or just a few people to stop bad things from happening can be seen as necessary. Turning the good guys into sex slaves is pointless.
Think he meant Saul, the Indigo Lantern that ended up in The Boys universe.
Now that I've mentioned him I think that a bad version of an Indigo Lantern would do this whole brainwashing thing, minus the sexual crimes, to better the world.
I can definitely see a different version of Saul that ended up in The Boys universe get frustrated with how things are and just mind whammie everyone.
I also think we would be less shocked, and even approve, if he did that to the ones in that universe considering how they are.
There is this fic called Compassion's Light where the author was planning for the SI to eventually get fed up with the status quo and mind control people to be better.
Last edited: