• An addendum to Rule 3 regarding fan-translated works of things such as Web Novels has been made. Please see here for details.
  • We've issued a clarification on our policy on AI-generated work.
  • Our mod selection process has completed. Please welcome our new moderators.
  • Due to issues with external spam filters, QQ is currently unable to send any mail to Microsoft E-mail addresses. This includes any account at live.com, hotmail.com or msn.com. Signing up to the forum with one of these addresses will result in your verification E-mail never arriving. For best results, please use a different E-mail provider for your QQ address.
  • For prospective new members, a word of warning: don't use common names like Dennis, Simon, or Kenny if you decide to create an account. Spammers have used them all before you and gotten those names flagged in the anti-spam databases. Your account registration will be rejected because of it.
  • Since it has happened MULTIPLE times now, I want to be very clear about this. You do not get to abandon an account and create a new one. You do not get to pass an account to someone else and create a new one. If you do so anyway, you will be banned for creating sockpuppets.
  • Due to the actions of particularly persistent spammers and trolls, we will be banning disposable email addresses from today onward.
  • The rules regarding NSFW links have been updated. See here for details.

With This Ring (Young Justice SI) (Thread Fourteen)

I don't think it'll be that difficult to convince Superman that letting someone that committed a genocide raise a child is not the best of ideas.

Eeeehhhh… he can be a great person, but as the Daxamites proved, he can also be a stubborn, stupid jackass. Note that the only thing he apologized for regarding that incident was trying to kill Paul - specifically, the thing he was mind controlled into doing. The one thing he knew Paul would forgive him for, or rather, that there was nothing to forgive, because he was mind controlled and couldn't be held accountable for his actions.

His morality demands that he see his moral code as the highest thing - and a lot of the time, he can be what the newest Superman movie was. "People were going to die." "Of course I put him against a cactus; he was trying to commit genocide." Clark can be amazing, a determined person trying to do good in a world that keeps getting murky and daring people to do nothing, out of fear of the consequences.

Or he can follow a code that says that drug users are bad, black and white. That women don't commit genocide, and mothers are always blameless, and should always be in charge of their child as long as they aren't outright molesting them/trying to kill them, since they love them. Old-fashioned and based on a ton of unsupported assumptions - he can be Golden Age Superman, who attacked weapons dealers and beat back physical abusers, or he can be what the corporations turned him into, a pretty supermodel talking about how it would be great if we all just got along and smiled at each other and trusted the system - and in this case, I'm not hopeful, because it's connected to his blind spots (Krypton, and parents).
 
Eeeehhhh… he can be a great person, but as the Daxamites proved, he can also be a stubborn, stupid jackass. Note that the only thing he apologized for regarding that incident was trying to kill Paul - specifically, the thing he was mind controlled into doing. The one thing he knew Paul would forgive him for, or rather, that there was nothing to forgive, because he was mind controlled and couldn't be held accountable for his actions.
To be fair to Superman about the Daxamite situation, you have to remember that it wasn't that long ago that Paul drugged Batman with a serum that turned him into a psychopath.

Bruce is Clark's friend and now Clark has to watch as his friend turns into a dictator.

What Paul did may have been necessary and got rid of Anti-Life, but it was still messed up.

The outcome of his actions may be good, but the actions themselves leave a lot to be desired.

It's not that difficult to imagine that Superman would want a second opinion instead of just taking Paul at his word.

Even if he knew that Paul wasn't lying, he also knows that Paul has a...unique way of seeing things.
 
Eeeehhhh… he can be a great person, but as the Daxamites proved, he can also be a stubborn, stupid jackass. Note that the only thing he apologized for regarding that incident was trying to kill Paul - specifically, the thing he was mind controlled into doing. The one thing he knew Paul would forgive him for, or rather, that there was nothing to forgive, because he was mind controlled and couldn't be held accountable for his actions.

His morality demands that he see his moral code as the highest thing - and a lot of the time, he can be what the newest Superman movie was. "People were going to die." "Of course I put him against a cactus; he was trying to commit genocide." Clark can be amazing, a determined person trying to do good in a world that keeps getting murky and daring people to do nothing, out of fear of the consequences.

Or he can follow a code that says that drug users are bad, black and white. That women don't commit genocide, and mothers are always blameless, and should always be in charge of their child as long as they aren't outright molesting them/trying to kill them, since they love them. Old-fashioned and based on a ton of unsupported assumptions - he can be Golden Age Superman, who attacked weapons dealers and beat back physical abusers, or he can be what the corporations turned him into, a pretty supermodel talking about how it would be great if we all just got along and smiled at each other and trusted the system - and in this case, I'm not hopeful, because it's connected to his blind spots (Krypton, and parents).
No offense but I feel like you're projecting a certain view onto Superman that doesn't match the characterization of him in the story. Frankly speaking, him sneaking off to Daxam to confirm for himself was genuinely the right thing to do given what he knew. Paul has shown to have a very different modus operandi that is at odds with the Justice League and he hasn't really cultivated the relationship with the League for them to believe him with no pushback.

Superman being weird on the upcoming issue is a given as you've rightly pointed out that it's connected to the things he's more sensitive about. However, until we see what he actually does, I feel like any judgement would be premature.
 
No offense but I feel like you're projecting a certain view onto Superman that doesn't match the characterization of him in the story. Frankly speaking, him sneaking off to Daxam to confirm for himself was genuinely the right thing to do given what he knew. Paul has shown to have a very different modus operandi that is at odds with the Justice League and he hasn't really cultivated the relationship with the League for them to believe him with no pushback.

Superman being weird on the upcoming issue is a given as you've rightly pointed out that it's connected to the things he's more sensitive about. However, until we see what he actually does, I feel like any judgement would be premature.
I mean, I give grieve to the Illustres for being so weird and villain-forgiving, but I don't doubt his good intentions nor his, frankly, strange honesty. He doesn't shy from reporting his weird and sometimes even objectionable actions. That Superman doesn't trust Paul to the level that he had to go check himself, even when the Illustres has saved or helped to save the world multiple times?

And let's not forget, not trusting Paul's word led to Superman opening himself to corruption/mind control and if the Illustres wasn't who he is, Superman would have killed a fellow hero that he apparently didn't trust.

The Illustres does have a different Modus Operandi and he doesn't want the Justice League to follow his, but that doesn't mean that every decision or action he makes has to be double checked by them. He might not be as close to most of the members, but I believe he merits some trust from everyone after everything he has done. Superman wouldn't even know of Daxam if Paul hadn't told him, in the first place.
 
It's not that Superman doesn't trust Paul, it's that Superman understands that Paul doesn't always view things through the same lens that he does, and Paul's perspective on things can sometimes be... not necessarily biased but unusual compared to the average human being.

Double checking something extreme to make sure that you have understood Paul correctly and aren't making the wrong assumptions is pretty reasonable given his track history. It is rather unfortunate that in that instance it resulted in mind control, but this is the DC-verse, getting unexpectedly mind controlled is just a reality that you have to deal with sometimes.

e: Also like, Paul isn't perfect, he can and has made mistakes. When you're dealing with something serious like potential child kidnapping it is entirely sensible to double check and make sure that everything lines up correctly.

I wouldn't be surprised if Superman fully expected to find out that everything that Paul had said about Daxam was true, but he decided to double check just in case, which is really not unreasonable. Trusting people is fine, but when something is important you double check anyway just to be sure, because sometimes shit happens.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top