Galeiam
Optimistically Asexual.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2014
- Messages
- 1,752
- Likes received
- 2,194
True But it's not like I ever explitly said that they were only those personalites, and the thing with Eternity was that he said that after somehow thinking that I was against a harem when nothing I wrote had anything resembling that...Bobs Beard said:I don't know why so many people do not get that the internet removes most tone and context from one's 'words', and as such if you don't want your words to be taken as earnest you make it exceedingly clear that they're not. This is a thing you did not do, which frankly you probably should have. It is, after all, impossible to read your mind, to look through the computer, to know you as a person rather than a handle and thus if you wish to convey overtones/be nonliteral, you need to accept the fact you're effectively speaking to strangers who do not know you or your ways. If you want them to grok you, you have to help them understand how you write/act rather than just expect them to magically know.If you have to read 'bent up over it' into things that is of course your right - it has no basis in reality but hey, opinions are one's own thing.
Bobs Beard said:Well gee, maybe it has to do with the fact you abruptly cite these categories immediately after talking about how you have fears of shallow, cookie-cutter inclusions in the harem.
Turns out that even if you make an independent statement, if it's nested in/after other stuff that colors how people read it - 'tis a fact of life.
Also, you really need to work on your ability to identify 'rants' - I don't think that term means what you think it it does.Having the category defined by 'latent power' doesn't make it any less absurdly broad than 'loli', to be perfectly honest - heck, 'hidden power' is practically an asiatic supertrope all its own, it's so prolific. Which, I might point out, makes it even sillier to try and minimize it's presence - it's like trying to minimize the presence of soda in stores - it's that pervasive.To be honest I don't either, as you seem to follow a pattern of raising a concern with poor phrasing and continuing to not clarify yourself well when people understandably don't intuit the meaning you were going after.
Case in point, if you'd been more clear in your first post I strongly doubt I or EternityChaos would have bothered to respond - but because you didn't here we are.
Feel free to label this another rant if you want, but that doesn't change the accuracy of what's being stated here. It would REALLY serve you well to instill more clarity into your posts to avoid issues like this - and since you seem to not enjoy this result it would seem a worthwhile endeavor.
I would probably agree with you if not for the fact that you argument about Koneko and Ruby was explicitly for their Behavior...If I wanted to write out all of their specific traits and personality quirks then I would, Ultra Potential Loli, just like Buxom battle maniac is an intentionally broad description. No reason to start off with a highly detailed account of them out of the blue when I'm just using them as an example for a broad subject. Writing out the entire character when I'm just using them to describe a broad subject just doesn't make any sense to me.
I'm gonna consider something ranting when an imagined slight is blown up and then another passing point is massively disassembled a rant..so what sue me.(please don't though, i'm broke)
Edit:
The problem here is that you keep expecting me to write a long as analysis on every point I'm making when so far nothing calls for it like this part.
Being swordswomen had almost nothing to do with their relevance in this example and more to do with their unused potential and that they were buxom fighters, as a passing note and even stated to only partially fill the typecasting there is no need to expound on matters. But here once an actual debate has started Then it's time to point out that Xenovia being so hesitant to use Durandall even when face with extreme odds would qualify her as ultra potential.Bobs Beard said:Sure, if you think 'swordswoman' is a category with zero variance in it too.
Last edited by a moderator: