Ardy
I trust you know where the happy button is?
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2017
- Messages
- 748
- Likes received
- 3,776
That sounds awesome. Link?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, turns out I got that wrong. She just phoned the police after talking to him for 10 minutes or so when he broke into her room. It's called the Michael Fagan incident.
No longer does, the British Royal Family is basically a tourist atraction nowadays.
Or the royal family wouldn't have got in trouble by how they expended money.
No, that was a reference to the 'no modern politics' rule. Some powersNo longer does, the British Royal Family is basically a tourist atraction nowadays.
Or the royal family wouldn't have got in trouble by how they expended money.
She lacks judicial power except for royal pardons, and how much she can actually use her powers without a revolution happening is questionable, but she does have to approve all laws and can cancel parliament, as well as technical control of the executive branch, so she very much legally has the entire thrust of the royal family power."Ignored" likely isn't the right word. "Failed to notice" would probably be much more accurate. Honestly, how likely are you to notice that a gnat on your shoe is trying to talk to you?
I'm not British, so grain of salt, but according to a very recent video essay on the powers of the Queen done by the Today I Found Out YT channel - who's face, Simon Whistler, IS a Brit - the Queen legally could, if she chose, rule with an iron fist. She chooses to mostly not get involved in politics because, let's be honest, it wouldn't take a whole lot these days for the monarchy to be completely abolished if public opinion turned against them. But the thrust of the essay was that the technical power of the Crown is basically undiminished from what it was a few hundred years ago when the monarch of the time ruled in actuality instead of just in name.
Though, again, another grain of salt here, I got basically everything I know about the subject from an educational YouTube channel. Thus there's every possibility my knowledge is not quite accurate.
Ok, sorry. Didn't seem very politically relevant to modern times, since the British queen hasn't done much politically relevant for a while now.I know that I've been joking about it, but talking about what powers monarchs have in the present day does violate the 'no modern politics' rule, so please stop doing it. I don't want to have to move again.
My brief look at the wikidepdia pages suggested that the Emperor had already decided to be the last emperor as he didn't think a woman could do the job and he had no sons.
"Ignored" likely isn't the right word. "Failed to notice" would probably be much more accurate. Honestly, how likely are you to notice that a gnat on your shoe is trying to talk to you?
I'm not British, so grain of salt, but according to a very recent video essay on the powers of the Queen done by the Today I Found Out YT channel - who's face, Simon Whistler, IS a Brit - the Queen legally could, if she chose, rule with an iron fist. She chooses to mostly not get involved in politics because, let's be honest, it wouldn't take a whole lot these days for the monarchy to be completely abolished if public opinion turned against them. But the thrust of the essay was that the technical power of the Crown is basically undiminished from what it was a few hundred years ago when the monarch of the time ruled in actuality instead of just in name.
Though, again, another grain of salt here, I got basically everything I know about the subject from an educational YouTube channel. Thus there's every possibility my knowledge is not quite accurate.
Unfortunately, as has been proven, there's something appealing to people about totalitarian rulers. There's nothing technically stopping Britain from having the next Hitler come from the royal family except for the fact that it's unlikely for someone to be that charismatic.The laws have changed a tad since a hundred years ago and a hundred years ago most of the government duties weren't done by the queen or king anyway.
Considering the British Royal family seems to even have lost the privilege to do whatever the fuck they wanted with money, the Royal Family taking back the power would need a huge mayority of popular support.
It technically can be done, but is very unlikely.
It would need the next queen or king to be more popular than Lady Di and for the British government to fuck up so badly that the idea of a strong monarchy would be appealing.
Perhaps he should have been third to last after yourself?"Second to last person I'd go to for romantic advice." I mean, at least Lord Atrocitus was married once upon a time.
This seems like a bad way to react to a yandere with a red power ring.
Ah, back to the Teen Titans cartoon-verse Red Lantern alt. How long's it been? Fools Canon?
Thank goodness the main SI's version isn't quite this bad.Komand'r looks at me with a mild frown on her brow, and that.. slight edge of suspicion, deeply embedded instinct telling her that it might be time to fight or run.
ooh, Romantic... For a rage-driven beast of a lanternI lift up the severed head of the navy's admiral. "I… Thought that we could burn our handprints in this together."
Extraneous word.I mean, they're not the batch-produced like the Citadelians...
Would 'been in any' or 'been at any' work better?"It's been a while since I've been any one place long enough to bother."
Oh dear. Raul, you cad!
Because Tamaraneans probably have different ideas about age of consent than you do, Raul...I don't think she can see my eyes through my faceplate, but she's giving me an odd look. "Why does it matter?"
One of the high points of the Red Lanterns comic book: these two guys."I will, but I want to have this conversation face to face inside an atmosphere." I turn to our left, where Lanterns Skallox and Zox are sitting on a floating lump of debris, watching us. Zox appears to have found a bowl of popcorn somewhe-.
"That's not how humans do things, Skallox."
Careful there, Raul..."I fight people I want to kill. I have no intention of fighting the woman I love."
Atrocitus would beg to differ, I think.
Interesting. Atrocitus keyed the aggression level down enough to allow Construct creation?
Extraneous Quote mark."Have fun with that." I turn in the direction of Tamaran. Ring, I've had enough of your attitude today. Kysarr. Now."
Oh my, I think the environmental shield is the most telling aspect. She surely knows what it collapsing means...She blinks, eyes and hands returning to normal as she descends from the sky in a.. slightly uncontrolled way. "Uh-. W-what?"
Teenage embarrassment. So cute."I just-. Ah… Need to-." She rises off the ground, pointing vaguely behind her. "Thing."
Hey, it's not a refusal. Presumably she needs to think about it...
Thank you, corrected.I mean, they're not the batch-produced like the Citadelians...
Extraneous word.
"It's been a while since I've been any one place long enough to bother."
Would 'been in any' or 'been at any' work better?
"That's not how humans do thing, Skallox."
"That's not how humans do things, Skallox."
"Have fun with that." I turn in the direction of Tamaran. Ring, I've had enough of your attitude today. Kysarr. Now."
Extraneous Quote mark.
Wouldnt she have been 14 considering that they started having sex 13 months ago.
I might be wrong, but I believe the last time he was discussed was when Zoat described a possible future episode involving the Titans inadvertently protecting mad scientists doing experiments on people who, after forming a suicide pact, received a red power ring and started slaughtering the scientists who did these horrible things to them.
Seems like something that would happen to Blue Lantern Paul.also since Yanderes are back on the table, I would like to see a magical girl go crazy and murder everyone although seeing Red lantern paul go love crazy and commit genocide is a decent consolation prize.
Dawwww, those two are so adorable together.
That's called "rape", and is in fact frowned upon in most societies.To turn the situation on it's head, I'm not sure I'd want to say no to a Red Corps member crawling into my bed, regardless of age. The consequences seem...marginally less bad in accepting, instead of refusing.
Morality does usually take second place to a survival instinct.
Edit: Heh...you're screwed no matter what you do, might as well enjoy the ride.
Raul was pretty clear about consent and such during their first encounter, so I doubt that was the case.That's called "rape", and is in fact frowned upon in most societies.
That's called "rape", and is in fact frowned upon in most societies.