Buggy123
I trust you know where the happy button is?
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 504
- Likes received
- 3,753
Huh, some of that is kinda weird, but it's also common for businesses to focus on PR above quality and customer service. But it's also perfectly possible for "cost-efficiency" to be bad; see: companies deciding whether or not to issue product recalls on the basis of "will the recalls cost us more money than potential lawsuits from injury and death caused by our product?". I guess that also focusing on providing good products/service might avoid that, though.Well TBF from what I knew in that situation, society was already breaking down by all the "helpful" laws which had domino-effects that were somehow supported by other rich people who somehow found that being "selfless" or pretending to be "selfless" would somehow give them power via good PR and connections rather than delivering good product and running businesses cost-efficiently and those "selfish" rich businessmen and other scientists and inventors whether they actually cared or not were gonna try and rebuild society
I think in that book, society and even the protagonists argued that caring first about your friends and family rather than society as a whole was "selfish", oh wait that was Anthem where they actually banned having friends and lovers and ironically whilst "selfish" the protagonist in the end was intending to still eventually help others
Personally, I would say that the real issue behind both of those bad outcomes is something else entirely.
I don't disagree with you, but that is a really, really, rea-hea-heally wide net right there.But yeah, "selfish" can be what YOU think is good for others whilst not caring too much about their input whether valid or not.
That basically includes... almost every parent whose ever lived, most pious individuals from most religions which have ever existed, just about anyone who's vouched for any particular philosophy, most philosophers, most politicians, oodles of people who don't fit in any particular category...
I'd wager that's like, 90% of the population right there. It's very rare that you see someone with a mindset along the lines of "you do you" to such a degree.
Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of instances of that might be considered a mental illness. Just about anyone who cares about people has some idea of how they ought to be doing things. Only the thoroughly asocial would be genuinely selfless, because they don't care about other people at all.
Again, not actually disagreeing with you. I'm just pointing out that humans tend to be systemically selfish.